RE LUU HUNG VEIT DERRICK
The court found that on the material before it the trustees' continued treatment of Toggenburger as a creditor (based on an asserted assignment and documents) did not amount to misconduct or an inability to act impartially and was not a proper basis for removal under s96(2). The trustees' conduct in relation to the appeal and funding did not impugn their office; major creditors supported the trustees. Accordingly no statutory ground for removal was established and the application was dismissed.
- Citation
- RE LUU HUNG VEIT DERRICK
- Parties
- Bankrupt: Luu Hung Veit Derrick; Trustee in Bankruptcy: Wong Tak Man Stephen; Trustee in Bankruptcy: Osman Mohammed Arab; Named Trustee Company (not Actual Office‑holders): RSM Nelson Wheeler Corporate Advisory Limited; Creditor and Creditors' Committee Member: Christian Emil Toggenburger; Petitioner/creditor: Zhang Liyuan; Creditor and Creditors' Committee Member: Lam Ching Kui; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2013
- Case Number
- HCB4776/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Proceedings / Chambers Hearing and Decision on Summons to Remove Trustees and to Direct Official Receiver Re Creditors' Committee Member
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed in full
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Trustee, Creditors' Committee Membership, Standing (locus Standi), Misconduct of Trustees, Assignment of Debt, Trustee Duties and Impartiality, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Luu Hung Veit Derrick
Bankrupt
Wong Tak Man Stephen
Trustee in Bankruptcy
Osman Mohammed Arab
Trustee in Bankruptcy
RSM Nelson Wheeler Corporate Advisory Limited
Named Trustee Company (not Actual Office‑holders)
Christian Emil Toggenburger
Creditor and Creditors' Committee Member
Zhang Liyuan
Petitioner/creditor
Lam Ching Kui
Creditor and Creditors' Committee Member
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Proceedings / Chambers Hearing and Decision on Summons to Remove Trustees and to Direct Official Receiver Re Creditors' Committee Member
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trustees guilty of misconduct under s96(2)(a) of the Bankruptcy Ordinance
- 2 Whether trustees' connection or relation to a creditor made them unable to act impartially under s96(2)(d)
- 3 Whether the interests of creditors required removal under s96(2)(e)
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that on the material before it the trustees' continued treatment of Toggenburger as a creditor (based on an asserted assignment and documents) did not amount to misconduct or an inability to act impartially and was not a proper basis for removal under s96(2). The trustees' conduct in relation to the appeal and funding did not impugn their office; major creditors supported the trustees. Accordingly no statutory ground for removal was established and the application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed in full
Orders
- Application to remove Mr Wong Tak Man Stephen and Mr Osman Mohammed Arab as trustees dismissed
- Application to direct Official Receiver to remove Mr Christian Emil Toggenburger from the creditors' committee dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment