TANG WAI CHEE AND ANOTHER v. CHAN SIK HONG AND ANOTHER
The Lands Tribunal lacks jurisdiction under s.8(7) because the evidence established that the tenancy was surrendered in 1988 and the respondents were occupying the disputed areas as tenants or tolerated occupiers of the government (or as trespassers), not as former tenants of the applicants; therefore the statutory prerequisite of a pre-existing landlord-tenant holding-over did not exist and possession relief cannot be granted by the Tribunal.
- Citation
- TANG WAI CHEE AND ANOTHER v. CHAN SIK HONG AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: TANG Wai-chee; 2nd Applicant: TANG Cheuk-chuen; 1st Respondent: CHAN Sik-hong; 2nd Respondent: CHUNG Chuen-chup
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2000
- Case Number
- LDPE794/1999
- Procedural Posture
- Landlord and Tenant Dispute Over Repossession of Land and Mesne Profits Before the Lands Tribunal / Ruling on Jurisdiction With Order to Transfer to the District Court
- Outcome
- Lands Tribunal finds it has no jurisdiction and transfers the proceedings to the District Court
- Legal Topics
- Repossession, Tenancy Surrender, Held Over Tenancy, Jurisdiction of Lands Tribunal, Land Resumption, Boundary Dispute
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TANG Wai-chee
1st Applicant
TANG Cheuk-chuen
2nd Applicant
CHAN Sik-hong
1st Respondent
CHUNG Chuen-chup
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Landlord and Tenant Dispute Over Repossession of Land and Mesne Profits Before the Lands Tribunal / Ruling on Jurisdiction With Order to Transfer to the District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Lands Tribunal has jurisdiction under s.8(7) of the Lands Tribunal Ordinance to grant possession where the alleged tenancy was surrendered
- 2 Whether the respondents occupy land as former tenants of the applicants or as tenants/tolerated occupiers of the government
- 3 Whether surrender occurred in 1988 and, if so, effect on landlord-tenant relationship
Ratio Decidendi
The Lands Tribunal lacks jurisdiction under s.8(7) because the evidence established that the tenancy was surrendered in 1988 and the respondents were occupying the disputed areas as tenants or tolerated occupiers of the government (or as trespassers), not as former tenants of the applicants; therefore the statutory prerequisite of a pre-existing landlord-tenant holding-over did not exist and possession relief cannot be granted by the Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Lands Tribunal finds it has no jurisdiction and transfers the proceedings to the District Court
Orders
- Case forthwith transferred to the District Court
- Each party to bear his own costs incurred in the Lands Tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment