CANTOR FITZGERALD EUROPE AND ANOTHER v. JASON JON BOYER AND OTHERS
Plaintiffs failed to prove coordinated procurement or concerted breaches of fiduciary or fidelity duties; Hong Kong Employment Ordinance mandatory provisions applied to employees engaged in Hong Kong notwithstanding an express foreign governing law choice and entitled employees to terminate by payment in lieu, restrictive covenants as drafted were generally unenforceable for being overbroad or of unreasonable duration or ambiguous, Cash AD was valid and repayable by Boyer, and specified payments in lieu were ordered for Ainslie and McGonegal.
- Citation
- CANTOR FITZGERALD EUROPE AND ANOTHER v. JASON JON BOYER AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Cantor Fitzgerald Europe; 2nd Plaintiff: Cantor Fitzgerald (Hong Kong) Capital Markets Limited; 1st Defendant: Jason Jon Boyer; 2nd Defendant: Bradford Ainslie; 3rd Defendant: Brett McGonegal; 4th Defendant: Uwe Henke von Parpart
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 February 2012
- Case Number
- HCA1160/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Employment and Fiduciary Duties (high Court, Court of First Instance) / Judgment (29 February 2012)
- Outcome
- Judgment: majority of plaintiffs' claims dismissed; specific monetary and procedural orders made in favour of employers and defendants as set out.
- Legal Topics
- Resignation, Secondment, Non Solicitation, Non Compete, Payment in Lieu of Notice, Liquidated Damages, Bonus Loan (cash Ad), Legal Professional Privilege, Accounting for Sums
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cantor Fitzgerald Europe
1st Plaintiff
Cantor Fitzgerald (Hong Kong) Capital Markets Limited
2nd Plaintiff
Jason Jon Boyer
1st Defendant
Bradford Ainslie
2nd Defendant
Brett McGonegal
3rd Defendant
Uwe Henke von Parpart
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Employment and Fiduciary Duties (high Court, Court of First Instance) / Judgment (29 February 2012)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendants breached duties of fidelity or fiduciary duties by procuring or acting in concert to resign and join competitor
- 2 Whether defendants failed to disclose approaches or intention to join competitor under contractual clauses
- 3 Whether defendants conspired to injure employer by unlawful means
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiffs failed to prove coordinated procurement or concerted breaches of fiduciary or fidelity duties; Hong Kong Employment Ordinance mandatory provisions applied to employees engaged in Hong Kong notwithstanding an express foreign governing law choice and entitled employees to terminate by payment in lieu, restrictive covenants as drafted were generally unenforceable for being overbroad or of unreasonable duration or ambiguous, Cash AD was valid and repayable by Boyer, and specified payments in lieu were ordered for Ainslie and McGonegal.
Court Disposition
Judgment: majority of plaintiffs' claims dismissed; specific monetary and procedural orders made in favour of employers and defendants as set out.
Orders
- Boyer to pay US$400000 as payment in lieu of notice to CFE
- Boyer to pay US$425793.23 as outstanding balance under the Cash Advance Distribution Agreement as at 30 May 2011
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment