OLIVER KATHERINE QUEBEC v. PO SING EMPLOYMENT SERVICE CENTRE LTD
Leave to appeal was dismissed because the claimant's second action concerned the same subject matter as an earlier dismissed claim and therefore could not proceed, the claimant failed to provide particulars of any alleged new evidence and failed to appear, and appeals from the Tribunal must raise points of law.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- OLIVER KATHERINE QUEBEC v. PO SING EMPLOYMENT SERVICE CENTRE LTD
- Parties
- Claimant (appellant): Oliver Katherine Quebec; Defendant (respondent): Po Sing Employment Service Centre Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2013
- Case Number
- HCSA2/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Small Claims Tribunal / Application for Leave to Appeal (judgment)
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Fresh Evidence on Appeal, Small Claims Procedure, Leave to Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oliver Katherine Quebec
Claimant (appellant)
Po Sing Employment Service Centre Limited
Defendant (respondent)
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Small Claims Tribunal / Application for Leave to Appeal (judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether alleged new evidence justifies reconsideration on appeal
- 3 Whether claimant's second claim amounted to an impermissible multiple action (res judicata)
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was dismissed because the claimant's second action concerned the same subject matter as an earlier dismissed claim and therefore could not proceed, the claimant failed to provide particulars of any alleged new evidence and failed to appear, and appeals from the Tribunal must raise points of law.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment