TYCZ v. SKY
Leave to appeal was refused because the Court was not satisfied that the trial judge's primary factual findings were plainly wrong; the judge properly exercised his discretion in concluding that awarding sole custody, care and control to the wife with the ordered access for the husband was in the paramount interest of the children.
- Citation
- TYCZ v. SKY
- Parties
- Petitioner (applicant): tycz; Respondent: Respondent
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2006
- Case Number
- HCMP938/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Custody Appeal (leave to Appeal) / Application for Leave to Appeal in Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal against the custody order refused.
- Legal Topics
- Custody, Access (visitation), Leave to Appeal, Standard of Review of Factual Findings, Paramountcy of Child's Welfare
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
tycz
Petitioner (applicant)
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Custody Appeal (leave to Appeal) / Application for Leave to Appeal in Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the Family Court custody order
- 2 Whether the trial judge's factual findings were plainly wrong such that the Court of Appeal should intervene
- 3 Whether joint custody was appropriate given the parties' lack of cooperation
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the Court was not satisfied that the trial judge's primary factual findings were plainly wrong; the judge properly exercised his discretion in concluding that awarding sole custody, care and control to the wife with the ordered access for the husband was in the paramount interest of the children.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal against the custody order refused.
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal against the custody order refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment