MJP v. JWP
The Court found the judge had properly evaluated the evidence, made correct findings of fact and properly exercised discretion; because the petitioner showed no reasonable prospect of success, leave to appeal was refused.
- Citation
- MJP v. JWP
- Parties
- Petitioner: Petitioner; Respondent: Respondent
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2010
- Case Number
- HCMP2637/2009
- Procedural Posture
- High Court Miscellaneous Proceedings HCMP 2637/2009 / Application for Leave to Appeal (refused)
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; stay of proceedings removed; no order as to costs except respondent's own costs to be taxed in accordance with Legal Aid Regulations.
- Legal Topics
- Relocation of Children, Leave to Appeal, Exercise of Judicial Discretion, Findings of Fact
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Petitioner
Petitioner
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
High Court Miscellaneous Proceedings HCMP 2637/2009 / Application for Leave to Appeal (refused)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether the judge erred in permitting the respondent to remove three children from Hong Kong
- 3 Whether the judge misapplied the law or misdirected on custody, care and control
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the judge had properly evaluated the evidence, made correct findings of fact and properly exercised discretion; because the petitioner showed no reasonable prospect of success, leave to appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; stay of proceedings removed; no order as to costs except respondent's own costs to be taxed in accordance with Legal Aid Regulations.
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused.
- Stay of proceedings removed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment