LILY CHEUNG AND ANOTHER v. THE STANDARD CHARTERED BANK HONG KONG TRUSTEE LTD AND OTHERS

LILY CHEUNG AND ANOTHER v. THE STANDARD CHARTERED BANK HONG KONG TRUSTEE LTD AND OTHERS

The broker (Mok) held shares and monies on fiduciary terms so the deceased possessed beneficial rights in the assets; the 16 May 1977 instruction to add Gordon to the broker\'s account did not effect an out-and-out transfer or an immediate gift of the equitable interests in those assets and the deceased did not intend an immediate gift; accordingly the second defendant acquired no beneficial interest in rem in the Mok 1 or HSBC securities by survivorship or the instruction; the second defendant\'s control rendered him a trustee for the estate and his appropriation was a breach; the professional trustee breached duties by failing to investigate and disclose, by accepting an indemnity that...

Citation
LILY CHEUNG AND ANOTHER v. THE STANDARD CHARTERED BANK HONG KONG TRUSTEE LTD AND OTHERS
Parties
First Plaintiff: LILY CHEUNG; Second Plaintiff: PAN TSU MIN; First Defendant: THE STANDARD CHARTERED BANK HONG KONG TRUSTEE LIMITED; Second Defendant: GORDON PAN otherwise known as GORDON V. MING PAN
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
28 February 1990
Case Number
HCA5464/1987
Procedural Posture
Probate and Trust Litigation (estate Administration) / High Court Judgment Following Full Trial
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiffs on liability: second defendant (Gordon Pan) held to have no beneficial rights in the contested securities and to have acted in breach of trust; first defendant (trustee) held to have breached fiduciary duties, to have committed devastavit and to be liable to the plaintiffs; relief granted...
Legal Topics
Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust, Presumption of Advancement, Devastavit, Tracing, Conflict of Interest of Trustees, Professional Negligence of Trustee, Effective Conveyance of Equitable Interest
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LILY CHEUNG

First Plaintiff

PAN TSU MIN

Second Plaintiff

THE STANDARD CHARTERED BANK HONG KONG TRUSTEE LIMITED

First Defendant

GORDON PAN otherwise known as GORDON V. MING PAN

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Probate and Trust Litigation (estate Administration) / High Court Judgment Following Full Trial

  1. 1 Whether the Mok 1 and HSBC securities accounts formed part of the deceased\'s estate or belonged beneficially to the second defendant
  2. 2 Whether the 16 May 1977 instruction to broker effected an immediate gift or effective conveyance of beneficial interests
  3. 3 Whether the broker-client relationship created beneficial rights in the deceased as against the broker (fiduciary relationship) or merely a debtor-creditor running account

Ratio Decidendi

The broker (Mok) held shares and monies on fiduciary terms so the deceased possessed beneficial rights in the assets; the 16 May 1977 instruction to add Gordon to the broker\'s account did not effect an out-and-out transfer or an immediate gift of the equitable interests in those assets and the deceased did not intend an immediate gift; accordingly the second defendant acquired no beneficial interest in rem in the Mok 1 or HSBC securities by survivorship or the instruction; the second defendant\'s control rendered him a trustee for the estate and his appropriation was a breach; the professional trustee breached duties by failing to investigate and disclose, by accepting an indemnity that...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiffs on liability: second defendant (Gordon Pan) held to have no beneficial rights in the contested securities and to have acted in breach of trust; first defendant (trustee) held to have breached fiduciary duties, to have committed devastavit and to be liable to the plaintiffs; relief granted...

Orders

  • Plaintiffs entitled to relief against the trustee as claimed in paragraphs (1)-(5) of the prayer (disclosure, account and remedy for failures)
  • Plaintiffs entitled to relief against the second defendant as claimed in paragraphs (7)-(14) of the prayer including ordering return/trace of assets and an inquiry into loss or damage