WONG CHICK KEUNG AND ANOTHER v. WOO MAN SANG AND OTHERS
Although the plaintiffs held a beneficial interest under a resulting trust, that equitable interest was defeated by the 2nd–4th defendants who were bona fide purchasers for value without notice and whose formal sale agreement was registered within one month before the lis pendens took effect; the plaintiffs' proprietary claim against the purchasers is dismissed, but plaintiffs have personal remedies against the trustee for breach of trust and against the trustee for conversion; the third‑party solicitors breached their duty to purchasers and must indemnify them, with quantum to be assessed.
- Citation
- WONG CHICK KEUNG AND ANOTHER v. WOO MAN SANG AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Wong Chick Keung; 2nd Plaintiff: Wan Shui Ling; 1st Defendant: Woo Man Sang; 2nd Defendant: Mo Lai Lung; 3rd Defendant: Moo Sim Lung; 4th Defendant: Mo Oi Lung; Third Party: Stevenson, Wong & Co. (sued as a firm)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2001
- Case Number
- HCMP3490/1991
- Procedural Posture
- Trust and Property Dispute (resulting Trust, Conveyancing and Priority) / Final Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' proprietary claims against 2nd–4th defendants dismissed; plaintiffs entitled to declarations and damages against 1st defendant for breach of trust and conversion; 2nd–4th defendants entitled to indemnity and costs from third party; third party liable for negligence; costs orders made with taxation per...
- Legal Topics
- Resulting Trust, Lis Pendens, Priority of Registration, Bona Fide Purchaser Without Notice, Solicitor Negligence, Indemnity, Conversion, Vesting Order
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wong Chick Keung
1st Plaintiff
Wan Shui Ling
2nd Plaintiff
Woo Man Sang
1st Defendant
Mo Lai Lung
2nd Defendant
Moo Sim Lung
3rd Defendant
Mo Oi Lung
4th Defendant
Stevenson, Wong & Co. (sued as a firm)
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Trust and Property Dispute (resulting Trust, Conveyancing and Priority) / Final Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiffs held beneficial ownership of the property by resulting trust
- 2 Whether the purchasers (2nd–4th defendants) were bona fide purchasers for value without notice and obtained priority over the plaintiffs by registration
- 3 Priority between registered sale agreement and lis pendens under Land Registration Ordinance
Ratio Decidendi
Although the plaintiffs held a beneficial interest under a resulting trust, that equitable interest was defeated by the 2nd–4th defendants who were bona fide purchasers for value without notice and whose formal sale agreement was registered within one month before the lis pendens took effect; the plaintiffs' proprietary claim against the purchasers is dismissed, but plaintiffs have personal remedies against the trustee for breach of trust and against the trustee for conversion; the third‑party solicitors breached their duty to purchasers and must indemnify them, with quantum to be assessed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' proprietary claims against 2nd–4th defendants dismissed; plaintiffs entitled to declarations and damages against 1st defendant for breach of trust and conversion; 2nd–4th defendants entitled to indemnity and costs from third party; third party liable for negligence; costs orders made with taxation per...
Orders
- Declaration that 1st defendant has since 5 December 1991 held proceeds of sale on trust for the plaintiffs and incidental tracing, accounts and enquiries to be carried out
- Judgment against 1st defendant in the sum of 46000 HKD for conversion with interest at 10% from date of writ until judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment