YEUNG HOCK WAI also known as YEUNG HOCK WI v. CHAN WAI MAN the Administratrix of the Estate of YEUNG HUNG HEI PATRICK, Deceased
Leave to adduce handwriting expert evidence was granted because the authenticity of the disputed Letter is relevant to a central factual dispute (whether the Gift was subject to oral conditions), expert opinion is likely to assist the trial judge, the estimated expert costs are proportionate to the value of the interests at stake, and the interests of justice outweigh the delay and prejudice from adduction of such evidence.
- Citation
- YEUNG HOCK WAI also known as YEUNG HOCK WI v. CHAN WAI MAN the Administratrix of the Estate of YEUNG HUNG HEI PATRICK, Deceased
- Parties
- Plaintiff (original Action); 1st Defendant (counterclaim): Yeung Hock Wai also known as Yeung Hock Wi; Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (counterclaim); Administratrix of the Estate of Yeung Hung Hei Patrick (deceased): Chan Wai Man; 2nd Defendant (counterclaim): Asavayong Unruen; 3rd Defendant (counterclaim): Yeung Ka Hei
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2017
- Case Number
- HCA2812/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Dispute Over Beneficial Ownership of Property and Administration of Estate / Interlocutory/case Management (summons for Leave to Adduce Expert Handwriting Evidence)
- Outcome
- Summons granted; leave granted to adduce handwriting expert evidence and directions given
- Legal Topics
- Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust, Gift With Conditions Subsequent, Admissibility of Expert Evidence, Handwriting/expert Opinion, Partition of Property
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yeung Hock Wai also known as Yeung Hock Wi
Plaintiff (original Action); 1st Defendant (counterclaim)
Chan Wai Man
Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (counterclaim); Administratrix of the Estate of Yeung Hung Hei Patrick (deceased)
Asavayong Unruen
2nd Defendant (counterclaim)
Yeung Ka Hei
3rd Defendant (counterclaim)
Procedural Posture
Civil Dispute Over Beneficial Ownership of Property and Administration of Estate / Interlocutory/case Management (summons for Leave to Adduce Expert Handwriting Evidence)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfers (gifts) of 25% interests were subject to oral conditions subsequent and therefore resulted in a resulting or constructive trust in favour of the Father
- 2 Whether leave should be granted to adduce handwriting expert evidence on authenticity of a disputed company letter signature
- 3 Whether expert handwriting evidence is likely to be proportionate, helpful and cost‑effective in resolving the issue and whether delay/prejudice outweighs the need for the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to adduce handwriting expert evidence was granted because the authenticity of the disputed Letter is relevant to a central factual dispute (whether the Gift was subject to oral conditions), expert opinion is likely to assist the trial judge, the estimated expert costs are proportionate to the value of the interests at stake, and the interests of justice outweigh the delay and prejudice from adduction of such evidence.
Court Disposition
Summons granted; leave granted to adduce handwriting expert evidence and directions given
Orders
- Leave granted to the Father, Mrs Yeung and Jeffrey to appoint Mr Robert Radley as their handwriting expert to prepare a report on whether the purported signature of the Father appearing on the Letter is authentic
- Leave granted to Vivian to appoint Ms Michelle Novotny as her handwriting expert to prepare a report on whether the purported signature of the Father appearing on the Letter is authentic
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment