RE FORTUNE KING TRADING LTD
Although the claimant (Trustees) proved that Mr Luu provided the initial funds, the court found on the evidence (including Mr Luu's statements in the statement of affairs and in mortgage/legal charge documents, and the inference that company loan proceeds repaid Mr Luu) that those payments were loans to the Company which were repaid and therefore rebutted any presumption of resulting trust; accordingly the Company was both legal and beneficial owner and the Net Balance is company property; the Trustees failed to discharge burden of proof.
- Citation
- RE FORTUNE KING TRADING LTD
- Parties
- Company: Fortune King Trading Limited (君裕貿易有限公司); Trustees: Mr Wong Tak Man Stephen and Mr Osman Mohammed Arab (Trustees of the estate of Mr Luu Hung Viet Derrick); Creditor/claimant: Construction Limited; Liquidators: Ms Tso Yin Yee and Mr Pang Yiu Kwong (Liquidators, Vantage Advisory Limited)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2017
- Case Number
- HCCW432/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) Proceedings Under Cap 32 / Application for Determination Under Section 200(3) of the Companies (winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance
- Outcome
- Trustees' claim that the Net Balance is held on trust for the bankruptcy estate dismissed; Net Balance held legally and beneficially by the Company
- Legal Topics
- Resulting Trust, Beneficial Ownership of Sale Proceeds, Duties of Liquidators, Priority Between Creditor and Bankrupt Estate, Admission of Late Evidence
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fortune King Trading Limited (君裕貿易有限公司)
Company
Mr Wong Tak Man Stephen and Mr Osman Mohammed Arab (Trustees of the estate of Mr Luu Hung Viet Derrick)
Trustees
Construction Limited
Creditor/claimant
Ms Tso Yin Yee and Mr Pang Yiu Kwong (Liquidators, Vantage Advisory Limited)
Liquidators
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Proceedings Under Cap 32 / Application for Determination Under Section 200(3) of the Companies (winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the net balance of sale proceeds of the Property paid into court is legally and beneficially owned by the Company or held on trust for the bankrupt estate of Mr Luu
- 2 Whether the presumption of resulting trust arises and if so whether it is rebutted
- 3 Whether the liquidators breached their duty to investigate competing claims and the evidential consequences
Ratio Decidendi
Although the claimant (Trustees) proved that Mr Luu provided the initial funds, the court found on the evidence (including Mr Luu's statements in the statement of affairs and in mortgage/legal charge documents, and the inference that company loan proceeds repaid Mr Luu) that those payments were loans to the Company which were repaid and therefore rebutted any presumption of resulting trust; accordingly the Company was both legal and beneficial owner and the Net Balance is company property; the Trustees failed to discharge burden of proof.
Court Disposition
Trustees' claim that the Net Balance is held on trust for the bankruptcy estate dismissed; Net Balance held legally and beneficially by the Company
Orders
- The Trustees failed to prove a resulting trust; Net Balance to be treated as asset of Fortune King Trading Limited
- The Liquidators are not entitled to recover their costs of and occasioned by the Summons out of the assets of the Company
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment