TSE’S BROTHERS CO LTD v. KINGHALL DEVELOPMENT LTD AND ANOTHER
The court found on the evidence that no consideration was paid when Unit 16G was transferred to Tse’s Brothers and that the facts established a resulting trust in favour of Chong Sang and Tai Wing from 9 March 1995; the court further found the Composite Agreement (the 4 Agreements) and an Oral Agreement were in fact...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 1197
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hca 1341/2012); 1st Defendant (hca 2401/2012): TSE’S BROTHERS COMPANY LIMITED; 1st Defendant (hca 1341/2012): KINGHALL DEVELOPMENT LIMITED; 2nd Defendant (hca 1341/2012): SKYGIFT (KINGHALL) COMPANY LIMITED; Plaintiff (hca 2401/2012): TSE CHONG SANG; 2nd Defendant (hca 2401/2012): TSE TAI WING
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 July 2018
- Case Number
- HCA1341/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Actions Concerning Beneficial Ownership of Property, Trust and Proprietary Estoppel / Judgment of the Court of First Instance
- Outcome
- Declaration for claimant(s): Tse’s Brothers holds one equal half share of the beneficial interest in Unit 16G on trust for Chong Sang; declaration of occupation right for Chong Sang (or nominees) rent‑free subject to payment of related expenses for as long as No 21 Factory was used rent‑free by Tai Wing (ended...
- Legal Topics
- Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust, Beneficial Ownership, Duomatic Principle, Agency and Apparent Authority, Share Transfers, Mesne Profits
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TSE’S BROTHERS COMPANY LIMITED
Plaintiff (hca 1341/2012); 1st Defendant (hca 2401/2012)
KINGHALL DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
1st Defendant (hca 1341/2012)
SKYGIFT (KINGHALL) COMPANY LIMITED
2nd Defendant (hca 1341/2012)
TSE CHONG SANG
Plaintiff (hca 2401/2012)
TSE TAI WING
2nd Defendant (hca 2401/2012)
Procedural Posture
Civil Actions Concerning Beneficial Ownership of Property, Trust and Proprietary Estoppel / Judgment of the Court of First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the registered owner Tse’s Brothers held Unit 16G on trust for Chong Sang and Tai Wing in equal shares
- 2 Whether Tai Chi had authority (actual or apparent) to bind Tai Wing and whether the 4 Agreements/Composite Agreement and Oral Agreement were concluded
- 3 Whether the 2007 share transfers terminated any beneficial interest or gave effect to a new beneficial ownership
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the evidence that no consideration was paid when Unit 16G was transferred to Tse’s Brothers and that the facts established a resulting trust in favour of Chong Sang and Tai Wing from 9 March 1995; the court further found the Composite Agreement (the 4 Agreements) and an Oral Agreement were in fact accepted by Tai Wing (through conduct and communications) and that the representations and conduct gave rise to proprietary estoppel; consequentially the court declared Tse’s Brothers holds a one half beneficial interest for Chong Sang and granted a declaration of occupation rights (rent‑free subject to payment of related expenses) with mesne profits to be apportioned 50/50...
Court Disposition
Declaration for claimant(s): Tse’s Brothers holds one equal half share of the beneficial interest in Unit 16G on trust for Chong Sang; declaration of occupation right for Chong Sang (or nominees) rent‑free subject to payment of related expenses for as long as No 21 Factory was used rent‑free by Tai Wing (ended...
Orders
- Declare that since 9 March 1995 Tse’s Brothers Company Limited has held and still holds one equal half share of the beneficial interest in Unit 16G in trust for Tse Chong Sang
- Declare that Tse Chong Sang or persons nominated by him are authorised to occupy Unit 16G rent‑free for as long as No 21 Factory is used rent‑free by Tse Tai Wing or his nominees, subject to payment of related expenses; that arrangement terminated as from January 2013 with mesne profits/expenses apportioned 50/50...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment