DR. YIP CHI HIM ROGER AND ANOTHER v. LEE KWOK LEUNG AND ANOTHER
Court found plaintiffs (Yip/Capital) made false and fraudulent representations that Tabatha was a clean pink‑sheet shell and that reverse‑merger would be used; Lee relied on those representations and was induced to pay US$350,000 under Tabatha Contract; no contemporaneous or credible evidence justified a consensual change to direct filing or any written amendment; rescission was valid and restitution awarded. On defamation, Lee's allegations that Yip had defrauded were substantially true and s.26 applied to any ancillary imputations about an honorary doctorate; plaintiffs' defamation claim failed.
- Citation
- DR. YIP CHI HIM ROGER AND ANOTHER v. LEE KWOK LEUNG AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Roger Yip; 2nd Plaintiff: Characters Capital Group Ltd (Capital); 1st Defendant: Lee Kwok Leung (Stephen Lee); 2nd Defendant: Green Dragon Wood Products Co. Ltd
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2015
- Case Number
- HCA356/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Defamation, Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Breach of Contract Concerning OTCBB Listing / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for defendants (Lee/Green Dragon) on misrepresentation and defamation claims; rescission upheld; plaintiffs' primary contractual claim dismissed; restitution awarded to Lee
- Legal Topics
- Reverse Merger, Direct Filing, OTCBB Listing, Stock Purchase Agreement, Rescission and Restitution, Justification Defence to Defamation, Malicious Falsehood, Damages Calculation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Roger Yip
1st Plaintiff
Characters Capital Group Ltd (Capital)
2nd Plaintiff
Lee Kwok Leung (Stephen Lee)
1st Defendant
Green Dragon Wood Products Co. Ltd
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Defamation, Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Breach of Contract Concerning OTCBB Listing / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiffs (Yip/Capital) made fraudulent misrepresentations inducing purchase of Tabatha and Listing/EECL contracts
- 2 Whether defendants (Lee/Green Dragon) validly rescinded contracts and are entitled to restitution/damages
- 3 Whether Lee's emails to Yip constituted defamatory publication and, if so, whether defences of justification/qualified privilege apply
Ratio Decidendi
Court found plaintiffs (Yip/Capital) made false and fraudulent representations that Tabatha was a clean pink‑sheet shell and that reverse‑merger would be used; Lee relied on those representations and was induced to pay US$350,000 under Tabatha Contract; no contemporaneous or credible evidence justified a consensual change to direct filing or any written amendment; rescission was valid and restitution awarded. On defamation, Lee's allegations that Yip had defrauded were substantially true and s.26 applied to any ancillary imputations about an honorary doctorate; plaintiffs' defamation claim failed.
Court Disposition
Judgment for defendants (Lee/Green Dragon) on misrepresentation and defamation claims; rescission upheld; plaintiffs' primary contractual claim dismissed; restitution awarded to Lee
Orders
- Roger Yip and Characters Capital Group Ltd to pay Lee US$350000 plus interest at 2.5 percent above the best lending rate of the Hong Kong bank from 9 April 2009 until judgment
- Claim by Characters Capital Group Ltd for payment under the Listing Contract dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment