CHIK KWONG SUN AND ANOTHER v. PAU LAN YING (in her own capacity and in the capacity as the sole Administratrix of the estate of CHIK SIU, deceased)
Defendant failed to discharge the statutory and common law duties of a personal representative by excluding beneficiaries from her grant application, converting estate assets for her own use, failing to provide proper accounts or documentary support and failing to cooperate with court directions; consequently the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 1815
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: CHIK KWONG SUN; 2nd Plaintiff: CHIK KWONG HUNG; Defendant and Sole Administratrix of the Estate of CHIK SIU: PAU LAN YING
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 5 August 2020
- Case Number
- HCMP1612/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration Proceedings Under Order 85 and Probate and Administration Ordinance / Judgment (substantive Hearing)
- Outcome
- Grant of Letters of Administration to defendant revoked; defendant removed as administratrix; new grant to 2nd plaintiff; defendant ordered to render proper account and allow inspection; vesting order made in favour of 2nd plaintiff; costs to be paid personally by defendant (costs nisi).
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Removal of Administrator, Duty to Render Account, Vesting Order Under S.67 PAO, Assent to Personal Representative
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHIK KWONG SUN
1st Plaintiff
CHIK KWONG HUNG
2nd Plaintiff
PAU LAN YING
Defendant and Sole Administratrix of the Estate of CHIK SIU
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration Proceedings Under Order 85 and Probate and Administration Ordinance / Judgment (substantive Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the administratrix must render a proper account of the estate
- 2 Whether the grant of administration should be revoked or the administratrix removed
- 3 Whether the assent transferring the property should be set aside or the property vested back in the estate
Ratio Decidendi
Defendant failed to discharge the statutory and common law duties of a personal representative by excluding beneficiaries from her grant application, converting estate assets for her own use, failing to provide proper accounts or documentary support and failing to cooperate with court directions; consequently the grant was revoked and a new grant issued to the 2nd plaintiff under s.33 PAO to ensure due administration, and a vesting order under s.67 PAO was made to restore the property to the estate for sale and distribution; defendant was ordered to render a proper account within specified time and bear costs personally.
Court Disposition
Grant of Letters of Administration to defendant revoked; defendant removed as administratrix; new grant to 2nd plaintiff; defendant ordered to render proper account and allow inspection; vesting order made in favour of 2nd plaintiff; costs to be paid personally by defendant (costs nisi).
Orders
- Defendant to render a proper account of the estate within 42 days after service of the order
- Plaintiffs allowed to inspect supporting documents within 14 days after service of the account
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment