HHML v. RYD

HHML v. RYD

The husband failed at Stage I to show that the Spanish court was clearly and distinctly the more appropriate forum. Hong Kong has the stronger real and substantial connection chiefly because the parties are permanent Hong Kong residents, the children regard Hong Kong as home and welfare inquiries and substantive child proceedings have been conducted here; allowing a stay would risk multiplicity of proceedings and potential unfairness to the wife given the different likely treatment of the marriage settlement in Spain; accordingly the Forum Application to stay was dismissed.

Citation
HHML v. RYD
Parties
Petitioner: HHML; Respondent: RYD
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
5 June 2012
Case Number
HCMC7/2011
Procedural Posture
Divorce (matrimonial Causes) / Forum Non Conveniens Application (stage I and II Reasons for Decision)
Outcome
Forum Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Forum Non Conveniens, Jurisdiction, Child Custody, Maintenance Pending Suit, Matrimonial Property, Choice of Forum, Recognition and Enforcement of Prenuptial/marriage Settlements
Source Language
EN
Family Law Private International Law Civil Procedure Forum Non Conveniens Jurisdiction Child Custody Maintenance Pending Suit Matrimonial Property +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HHML

Petitioner

RYD

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce (matrimonial Causes) / Forum Non Conveniens Application (stage I and II Reasons for Decision)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Spanish court is clearly and distinctly the more appropriate forum than Hong Kong for the divorce proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the wife would be deprived of legitimate personal or juridical advantages if the Spanish forum were compelled
  3. 3 Whether the husband submitted to the jurisdiction of the Hong Kong court by bringing custody proceedings after issuing a forum challenge

Ratio Decidendi

The husband failed at Stage I to show that the Spanish court was clearly and distinctly the more appropriate forum. Hong Kong has the stronger real and substantial connection chiefly because the parties are permanent Hong Kong residents, the children regard Hong Kong as home and welfare inquiries and substantive child proceedings have been conducted here; allowing a stay would risk multiplicity of proceedings and potential unfairness to the wife given the different likely treatment of the marriage settlement in Spain; accordingly the Forum Application to stay was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Forum Application dismissed

Orders

  • Forum Application to stay dismissed
  • Costs nisi to petitioner (wife), to be paid by respondent and to be made absolute 14 days after handing down of these reasons for decision