RE THE EXPRESS BUILDERS CO LTD (the Company)
Where the court's taxation process of provisional liquidators' fees was put in train before a s209A(1) conversion order, the court has jurisdiction to complete that assessment rather than permitting withdrawal and deferring assessment to the committee of inspection; s209A/209B are primarily deeming and priority provisions and do not automatically shift assessment of pre-conversion provisional liquidators' fees to the committee; accordingly the court ordered the fee notes to remain in the taxation process and proceeded to finalize assessment if no adequate response received, and awarded costs to the Official Receiver to be paid from the company's assets.
- Citation
- RE THE EXPRESS BUILDERS CO LTD (the Company)
- Parties
- Company: The Express Builders Company Limited; Provisional/liquidators: David John Kennedy and Fan Wai Kuen (RSM Nelson Wheeler Corporate Advisory Services Limited); Official Receiver: The Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2004
- Case Number
- HCCW409/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) / Chambers Decision on Jurisdiction and Costs After Hearing
- Outcome
- Court ruled that the taxation process commenced before the s209A conversion order should be completed by the court; fee notes must not be withdrawn; only the Official Receiver's costs of the jurisdiction hearing ordered to be paid out of the Company's assets; Liquidators not entitled to recoup their hearing costs...
- Legal Topics
- S209 a Conversion to Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up, Remuneration of Provisional Liquidators, Jurisdiction to Tax Costs, Committee of Inspection Powers, Official Receiver Duties
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Express Builders Company Limited
Company
David John Kennedy and Fan Wai Kuen (RSM Nelson Wheeler Corporate Advisory Services Limited)
Provisional/liquidators
The Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) / Chambers Decision on Jurisdiction and Costs After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction after an order under s209A(1) to commence or complete taxation of provisional liquidators' fees where taxation was begun before conversion
- 2 Whether the committee of inspection in a creditors' voluntary winding up can approve pre-conversion fees of provisional liquidators and require the Official Receiver to pay from the Companies Liquidation Account
- 3 Allocation of costs for the jurisdiction hearing
Ratio Decidendi
Where the court's taxation process of provisional liquidators' fees was put in train before a s209A(1) conversion order, the court has jurisdiction to complete that assessment rather than permitting withdrawal and deferring assessment to the committee of inspection; s209A/209B are primarily deeming and priority provisions and do not automatically shift assessment of pre-conversion provisional liquidators' fees to the committee; accordingly the court ordered the fee notes to remain in the taxation process and proceeded to finalize assessment if no adequate response received, and awarded costs to the Official Receiver to be paid from the company's assets.
Court Disposition
Court ruled that the taxation process commenced before the s209A conversion order should be completed by the court; fee notes must not be withdrawn; only the Official Receiver's costs of the jurisdiction hearing ordered to be paid out of the Company's assets; Liquidators not entitled to recoup their hearing costs...
Orders
- Fee notes of the provisional liquidators are not to be withdrawn from the taxation process
- If no response to the court's letter dated 7 February 2004 is received from the liquidators within 14 days the court will finalise its assessment of the provisional liquidators' fees and disbursements
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment