SALIM MOHAMMED v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

SALIM MOHAMMED v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

The applicant voluntarily withdrew the leave application and there was nothing outstanding in the action; applying the Court of Appeal authority in Re Manik, the correct disposition is dismissal of the leave application rather than leaving the action at large.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] HKCFI 1312
Parties
Applicant: Salim Mohammed; Putative Respondent: Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office; Putative Interested Party: Director of Immigration
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
28 May 2024
Case Number
HCAL2488/2020
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review / Leave Application Dismissed Following Applicant's Withdrawal (consideration on Papers)
Outcome
Leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.
Legal Topics
Non Refoulement, Illegal Immigration, Judicial Review, Withdrawal of Proceedings, Leave to Apply
Source Language
en
Constitutional and Administrative Law Immigration Law Human Rights Law Non Refoulement Illegal Immigration Judicial Review Withdrawal of Proceedings Leave to Apply

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Salim Mohammed

Applicant

Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

Putative Respondent

Director of Immigration

Putative Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review / Leave Application Dismissed Following Applicant's Withdrawal (consideration on Papers)

  1. 1 Whether the court should dismiss an application for leave to apply for judicial review when the applicant voluntarily withdraws the application
  2. 2 Whether anything outstanding in the action requires the court to keep the action at large rather than dismiss it

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant voluntarily withdrew the leave application and there was nothing outstanding in the action; applying the Court of Appeal authority in Re Manik, the correct disposition is dismissal of the leave application rather than leaving the action at large.

Court Disposition

Leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.

Orders

  • Leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.