SCAIFFEE LTD v. CHOW HEI CHUEN AND OTHERS
The Tribunal found the buildings are post‑war and within Part II, the redevelopment scheme (with Building Authority approved plans) is in the public interest, and the applicant has genuine intention and sufficient financial means; accordingly repossession was ordered under s.53(2)(c) subject to specified conditions...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- SCAIFFEE LTD v. CHOW HEI CHUEN AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Applicant: SCAIFFEE LTD.; Respondent: CHOW HEI CHUEN & OTHERS
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 1983
- Case Number
- LDHA6/1983
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Repossession Under S.53(2)(c) Landlord and Tenant (consolidation) Ordinance / Decision (lands Tribunal)
- Outcome
- Order for repossession granted subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- Repossession for Redevelopment, Public Interest, Compensation to Tenants, Financial Capacity of Redeveloper, Building Plan Approval, Conditions Precedent to Repossession
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SCAIFFEE LTD.
Applicant
CHOW HEI CHUEN & OTHERS
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Repossession Under S.53(2)(c) Landlord and Tenant (consolidation) Ordinance / Decision (lands Tribunal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the premises are post‑war buildings to which Part II applies
- 2 Whether the applicant genuinely intends and has means to redevelop
- 3 Whether the redevelopment scheme is conducive to public interest under s.53A(1)
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found the buildings are post‑war and within Part II, the redevelopment scheme (with Building Authority approved plans) is in the public interest, and the applicant has genuine intention and sufficient financial means; accordingly repossession was ordered under s.53(2)(c) subject to specified conditions (plans lodged, commencement and completion timelines, minimum building cost, restrictions on assignment/solicitation until Occupation Permit issued, and compensation arrangements for tenants).
Court Disposition
Order for repossession granted subject to conditions
Orders
- Lodge copy of plans showing number and size of all dwellings and non‑domestic units; new buildings to provide 44 units in accordance with Exhibit A.7
- Commence new buildings within 6 months from delivery of vacant possession of all premises Nos.4, 6 and 8 Arbuthnot Road; complete within 48 months from date of this order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment