RE LEHMAN BROTHERS ASIA LTD (In Liquidation)
The court sanctioned each scheme because the statutory requirements were satisfied (proper notice, adequate explanatory statements, and statutory majorities voted in favour), a single class was justified by the creditors' common interest in avoiding expensive and uncertain litigation, and the scheme terms (including...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- RE LEHMAN BROTHERS ASIA LTD (In Liquidation)
- Parties
- Scheme Company (in Liquidation): Lehman Brothers Asia Limited (In Liquidation); Scheme Company (in Liquidation): Lehman Brothers Futures Asia Limited (In Liquidation); Scheme Company (in Liquidation): Lehman Brothers Securities Asia Limited (In Liquidation); Applicant / Proponent of Schemes: Joint and Several Liquidators (KPMG); Interested Party / Respondent: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2017
- Case Number
- HCMP2265/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Scheme of Arrangement Under the Companies Ordinance (part 13 Division 2) / Sanction Hearing and Reasons for Decision (sanction Granted)
- Outcome
- Sanction of three schemes of arrangement for Lehman Brothers Asia Ltd, Lehman Brothers Futures Asia Ltd and Lehman Brothers Securities Asia Ltd (sanctioned 21 December 2016)
- Legal Topics
- Scheme of Arrangement, Post Liquidation Interest (pli), Priority of Claims, Non Provable Claims, Class Composition for Scheme Meetings, Companies Ordinance S673
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lehman Brothers Asia Limited (In Liquidation)
Scheme Company (in Liquidation)
Lehman Brothers Futures Asia Limited (In Liquidation)
Scheme Company (in Liquidation)
Lehman Brothers Securities Asia Limited (In Liquidation)
Scheme Company (in Liquidation)
Joint and Several Liquidators (KPMG)
Applicant / Proponent of Schemes
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc
Interested Party / Respondent
Procedural Posture
Scheme of Arrangement Under the Companies Ordinance (part 13 Division 2) / Sanction Hearing and Reasons for Decision (sanction Granted)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether distributions should be treated interest-first or principal-first for PLI purposes
- 2 Whether PLI accrues to date of declaration or date of payment of distributions
- 3 Whether PLI is payable on contingent or future debts and on non-provable claims
Ratio Decidendi
The court sanctioned each scheme because the statutory requirements were satisfied (proper notice, adequate explanatory statements, and statutory majorities voted in favour), a single class was justified by the creditors' common interest in avoiding expensive and uncertain litigation, and the scheme terms (including specified PLI methodology and a 50% discount on non-provable claims) were ones that an intelligent and honest creditor could reasonably approve.
Court Disposition
Sanction of three schemes of arrangement for Lehman Brothers Asia Ltd, Lehman Brothers Futures Asia Ltd and Lehman Brothers Securities Asia Ltd (sanctioned 21 December 2016)
Orders
- Sanctioned schemes of arrangement for Lehman Brothers Asia Limited, Lehman Brothers Futures Asia Limited and Lehman Brothers Securities Asia Limited
- Approved explanatory statements and convening of single class meetings for each company (orders dated 6 September 2016 complied with)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment