SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHAN JEFFREY
Sentences were determined by assessing each respondent's role, conduct and personal circumstances: minor and non-violent participation merited suspended custodial sentences of one month or six weeks combined with fines (or no fine where personal circumstances dictated), whereas extensive, active involvement combined...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 2396
- Parties
- Applicant: Secretary for Justice; Respondent in HCMP 2917/2015: Siew Yun Long; Respondent in HCMP 2918/2015: Man For On; Respondent in HCMP 2919/2015: Lai Yu Sing; Respondent in HCMP 2920/2015: Law Wai Yan; Respondent in HCMP 2921/2015 and HCMP 575/2018: Chan Jeffrey; Respondent in HCMP 2922/2015: Chan Wai Fung; Respondent in HCMP 2924/2015: Chu Sui Ying; Respondent in HCMP 2925/2015: Yung Yiu Sing; Respondent in HCMP 2926/2015: Wong Ka Yee; Respondent in HCMP 2927/2015: Kong Kam To; Respondent in HCMP 2928/2015: Chan Ao Tien; Respondent in HCMP 2929/2015: Chan Pak Tao; Respondent in HCMP 2930/2015: Chan Wing Wah; Respondent in HCMP 2931/2015: Lou Tit Man; Respondent in HCMP 2932/2015: Leung Hon Lam
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2018
- Case Number
- HCMP575/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Committal Application (hcmp Miscellaneous Proceedings) / Sentence (reasons for Sentence Delivered)
- Outcome
- Sentences and fines imposed as specified for each respondent; costs awarded to applicant on indemnity basis with certificate for three counsel; respondents' own costs taxed under Legal Aid Regulations except Mr Lai Yu Sing.
- Legal Topics
- Committal, Suspended Sentence, Fines, Costs, Mitigation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Secretary for Justice
Applicant
Siew Yun Long
Respondent in HCMP 2917/2015
Man For On
Respondent in HCMP 2918/2015
Lai Yu Sing
Respondent in HCMP 2919/2015
Law Wai Yan
Respondent in HCMP 2920/2015
Chan Jeffrey
Respondent in HCMP 2921/2015 and HCMP 575/2018
Chan Wai Fung
Respondent in HCMP 2922/2015
Chu Sui Ying
Respondent in HCMP 2924/2015
Yung Yiu Sing
Respondent in HCMP 2925/2015
Wong Ka Yee
Respondent in HCMP 2926/2015
Kong Kam To
Respondent in HCMP 2927/2015
Chan Ao Tien
Respondent in HCMP 2928/2015
Chan Pak Tao
Respondent in HCMP 2929/2015
Chan Wing Wah
Respondent in HCMP 2930/2015
Lou Tit Man
Respondent in HCMP 2931/2015
Leung Hon Lam
Respondent in HCMP 2932/2015
Procedural Posture
Committal Application (hcmp Miscellaneous Proceedings) / Sentence (reasons for Sentence Delivered)
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for contempt/breach of court order
- 2 Whether to impose immediate custody or suspended sentence
- 3 Quantum of fines relative to role and means
Ratio Decidendi
Sentences were determined by assessing each respondent's role, conduct and personal circumstances: minor and non-violent participation merited suspended custodial sentences of one month or six weeks combined with fines (or no fine where personal circumstances dictated), whereas extensive, active involvement combined with conviction after trial justified immediate custody (four months for Lou Tit Man); costs awarded to the applicant including indemnity basis with certificate for three counsel and taxation of respondents' own costs except as specified.
Court Disposition
Sentences and fines imposed as specified for each respondent; costs awarded to applicant on indemnity basis with certificate for three counsel; respondents' own costs taxed under Legal Aid Regulations except Mr Lai Yu Sing.
Orders
- Siew Yun Long: fined HKD 15000; imprisonment 6 weeks, suspended for 12 months; payment period 3 months; default custody 6 weeks.
- Man For On: fined HKD 15000; imprisonment 6 weeks, suspended for 12 months; payment period 6 months; default custody 6 weeks.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment