SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. YUEN WAI SHAN AND ANOTHER

bjbj DCMP 2261/2011 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 2261 OF 2011 ___________________ BETWEEN SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE Applicant and YUEN WAI SHAN 1st Claimant SHUN FAT PAWN SHOP 2nd Claimant ___________________ Coram: Deputy District Judge Grace Chan in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation: SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. YUEN WAI SHAN AND ANOTHER
Parties: Applicant: Secretary for Justice; 1st Claimant: Yuen Wai Shan; 2nd Claimant: Shun Fat Pawn Shop
Court: District Court
Jurisdiction: Hong Kong
Judgment Date: 11 January 2012
Case Number: DCMP2261/2011
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Proceedings (interpleader) / Application for Leave to Appeal (post Judgment)
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Interpleader, Leave to Appeal, District Court Ordinance S63 A(2), Pawnbrokers Ordinance S23, Costs
Source Language: en

Civil Property Pawnbrokers Law Procedure Interpleader Leave to Appeal District Court Ordinance S63 A(2) Pawnbrokers Ordinance S23 +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 6

Parties

Secretary for Justice

Applicant

Yuen Wai Shan

1st Claimant

Shun Fat Pawn Shop

2nd Claimant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Proceedings (interpleader) / Application for Leave to Appeal (post Judgment)

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed

Orders

Leave to appeal by Shun Fat dismissed
Costs nisi in favour of 1st Claimant (Yuen) with 14 days to apply to vary the costs order nisi

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.