SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. YEUNG CHUNG LUNG AND OTHERS
The court concluded on the evidence (and absence of any explanation) that the 1st-3rd respondents committed false accounting, embezzlement and obstructive conduct amounting to defalcation, fraud and misfeasance engaging s214(1)(b),(c) and (d); therefore disqualification orders and a restitution order against the 1st respondent were appropriate, together with indemnity costs to the SFC.
- Citation
- SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION v. YEUNG CHUNG LUNG AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Petitioner: Securities and Futures Commission; 1st Respondent: Yeung Chung Lung; 2nd Respondent: Yang Le; 3rd Respondent: Ni Chao Peng; 4th Respondent (company): First Natural Foods Holdings Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2017
- Case Number
- HCMP205/2013
- Procedural Posture
- SFC Petition Under Section 214 Securities and Futures Ordinance / Judgment (hearing 11 January 2017; Judgment Delivered 17 February 2017)
- Outcome
- Petition allowed in part: liability under s214(1)(b),(c) and (d) proven against 1st-3rd respondents; disqualification and restitution ordered against 1st respondent; disqualification ordered against 2nd and 3rd respondents; costs to SFC on indemnity; no order as to Company costs.
- Legal Topics
- Section 214 SFO, Director Disqualification, Embezzlement, False Accounting, Misfeasance, Obstruction of Provisional Liquidators, Restitution to Assignee
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Securities and Futures Commission
Petitioner
Yeung Chung Lung
1st Respondent
Yang Le
2nd Respondent
Ni Chao Peng
3rd Respondent
First Natural Foods Holdings Limited
4th Respondent (company)
Procedural Posture
SFC Petition Under Section 214 Securities and Futures Ordinance / Judgment (hearing 11 January 2017; Judgment Delivered 17 February 2017)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st-3rd respondents' conduct amounted to defalcation, fraud or misfeasance under s214(1)(b) SFO
- 2 Whether shareholders were deprived of information under s214(1)(c) SFO
- 3 Whether conduct was oppressive under s214(1)(a) SFO
Ratio Decidendi
The court concluded on the evidence (and absence of any explanation) that the 1st-3rd respondents committed false accounting, embezzlement and obstructive conduct amounting to defalcation, fraud and misfeasance engaging s214(1)(b),(c) and (d); therefore disqualification orders and a restitution order against the 1st respondent were appropriate, together with indemnity costs to the SFC.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed in part: liability under s214(1)(b),(c) and (d) proven against 1st-3rd respondents; disqualification and restitution ordered against 1st respondent; disqualification ordered against 2nd and 3rd respondents; costs to SFC on indemnity; no order as to Company costs.
Orders
- Disqualification order against the 1st respondent (Yeung Chung Lung) for 12 years
- Disqualification orders against the 2nd respondent (Yang Le) and 3rd respondent (Ni Chao Peng) for 8 years each
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment