GUESS ?, INC. AND OTHERS v. LEE SECK MON AND OTHERS
Leave to re-amend was granted but conditional on provision of ordered security; security for costs was ordered only up to completion of discovery (staggered approach). Quantum was assessed with substantial discounts: 1st–6th defendants HK$13,000,000 to date and HK$15,000,000 to completion of discovery; 7th defendant...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- GUESS ?, INC. AND OTHERS v. LEE SECK MON AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: GUESS ?, INC.; 2nd Plaintiff: GEORGES MARCIANO; 3rd Plaintiff: MAURICE MARCIANO; 4th Plaintiff: ARMAND MARCIANO; 5th Plaintiff: PAUL MARCIANO; 1st Defendant: LEE SECK MON; 2nd Defendant: DELIA CHAN WAI SHEUNG; 3rd Defendant: FAMOUS HORSE GARMENT FACTORY LTD.; 4th Defendant: FAMOUS LABEL INTERNATIONAL CO. LTD.; 5th Defendant: GOODYEAR INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION (A firm); 6th Defendant: LUCKY HORSE GARMENT FACTORY LTD.; 7th Defendant: JORDACHE INTERNATIONAL (HK) LTD.; 8th Defendant: KRIO TRADINGS LTD.; 9th Defendant: GASOLINE LTD.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 1 June 1989
- Case Number
- HCA604/1986
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Derivative Action (intellectual Property and Company Rights) / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Re Amend and Applications for Security for Costs (order 23 R.1)
- Outcome
- Conditional grant of leave to re-amend; security for costs ordered up to completion of discovery with specified quantified and apportioned sums; liberty to apply for further security; amendment to be effected only after security provided; costs of present summonses reserved to be addressed.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Leave to Amend, Derivative Action, Insolvency/impecuniosity, Indemnity Agreements, Discovery, Apportionment of Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GUESS ?, INC.
1st Plaintiff
GEORGES MARCIANO
2nd Plaintiff
MAURICE MARCIANO
3rd Plaintiff
ARMAND MARCIANO
4th Plaintiff
PAUL MARCIANO
5th Plaintiff
LEE SECK MON
1st Defendant
DELIA CHAN WAI SHEUNG
2nd Defendant
FAMOUS HORSE GARMENT FACTORY LTD.
3rd Defendant
FAMOUS LABEL INTERNATIONAL CO. LTD.
4th Defendant
GOODYEAR INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION (A firm)
5th Defendant
LUCKY HORSE GARMENT FACTORY LTD.
6th Defendant
JORDACHE INTERNATIONAL (HK) LTD.
7th Defendant
KRIO TRADINGS LTD.
8th Defendant
GASOLINE LTD.
9th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Derivative Action (intellectual Property and Company Rights) / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Re Amend and Applications for Security for Costs (order 23 R.1)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether non-resident plaintiffs should be ordered to give security for costs under Order 23 r.1
- 2 Whether leave to substitute Gasoline Ltd. as plaintiff should be granted and on what conditions
- 3 Whether security should be ordered for all future costs or staged up to completion of discovery
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to re-amend was granted but conditional on provision of ordered security; security for costs was ordered only up to completion of discovery (staggered approach). Quantum was assessed with substantial discounts: 1st–6th defendants HK$13,000,000 to date and HK$15,000,000 to completion of discovery; 7th defendant HK$6,000,000 to date and HK$9,000,000 to completion of discovery. Apportionment: Marcianos to provide 10% of costs to date and Guess 90%; for costs from present to completion of discovery Gasoline to provide 10% and Guess 90%. Liberty to apply for further security and leave to amend effective only after security provided.
Court Disposition
Conditional grant of leave to re-amend; security for costs ordered up to completion of discovery with specified quantified and apportioned sums; liberty to apply for further security; amendment to be effected only after security provided; costs of present summonses reserved to be addressed.
Orders
- Leave to re-amend the Statement of Claim granted conditional upon provision of security for costs as ordered below prior to amendment taking effect; liberty to apply
- Security for costs ordered up to completion of discovery as follows: 1st–6th defendants — HK$13,000,000 (costs to date) and HK$15,000,000 (from present to completion of discovery); 7th defendant — HK$6,000,000 (costs to date) and HK$9,000,000 (from present to completion of discovery)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment