TANG WAI CHUN (鄧惠珍), the administratrix of the estate of MAN CHEUK HEI (文卓熙) also known as MAN CHEUK HI (文卓熙) and MAN CHEUK HI (文灼熙), DECEASED v. MAN KOK WAI AND ANOTHER
Where a plaintiff is ordinarily resident out of the jurisdiction and is a personal representative, the court may order security for costs because the personal representative is personally liable for costs and the existence or value of an indemnity from the estate is irrelevant to the defendant’s right to enforce costs; no exceptional circumstances justified admitting late valuation evidence; security was ordered in the sum of HK$1.2 million payable within 28 days and costs awarded to the 2nd Defendant.
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 2058
- Parties
- Plaintiff (administratrix of the Estate of Man Cheuk Hei, Deceased): Tang Wai Chun (鄧惠珍); 1st Defendant: Man Kok Wai (文國偉); 2nd Defendant: Man Kai Cheong (文啟昌)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 August 2024
- Case Number
- HCA765/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil — Security for Costs and Costs Dispute / Appeal From Master’s Order; Reasons for Decision by Deputy High Court Judge in Chambers
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed in part; original order dismissed and security quantum varied
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Personal Representative Liability for Costs, Admission of Further Evidence, Valuation of Estate Assets, Enforcement/partition of Co Owned Land
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tang Wai Chun (鄧惠珍)
Plaintiff (administratrix of the Estate of Man Cheuk Hei, Deceased)
Man Kok Wai (文國偉)
1st Defendant
Man Kai Cheong (文啟昌)
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil — Security for Costs and Costs Dispute / Appeal From Master’s Order; Reasons for Decision by Deputy High Court Judge in Chambers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs should be ordered against a plaintiff ordinarily resident out of the jurisdiction who sues as administratrix
- 2 Whether a defendant can enforce a costs order against the personal representative or the estate and whether the value of the estate defeats an order for security
- 3 Whether to grant leave to file late additional affirmation evidence (4th affirmation)
Ratio Decidendi
Where a plaintiff is ordinarily resident out of the jurisdiction and is a personal representative, the court may order security for costs because the personal representative is personally liable for costs and the existence or value of an indemnity from the estate is irrelevant to the defendant’s right to enforce costs; no exceptional circumstances justified admitting late valuation evidence; security was ordered in the sum of HK$1.2 million payable within 28 days and costs awarded to the 2nd Defendant.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed in part; original order dismissed and security quantum varied
Orders
- Appeal dismissed against the Master’s order dismissing the Summons and ordering security for costs
- Summons dated 2 April 2024 for leave to file the 4th affirmation dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment