PATRICK HUNG HING YU v. HO YIN MAN AND OTHERS
The summons to set aside the default judgment and to withdraw the 8 June 2007 admissions is dismissed: D1 had notice of the proceedings in 2007 and made multiple court filings and admissions then; his belated change of story after the deceased's death lacks credibility and contemporaneous support, his delay was inordinate and unjustified and would cause prejudice to the plaintiff; accordingly there is no real prospect of success sufficient to set aside the default judgment or allow withdrawal of admissions.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 1015
- Parties
- Plaintiff (executrix of the Estate of Patrick Hung Hing Yu): Huang Kai Chiun Dorothy; Original Plaintiff (deceased): Patrick Hung Hing Yu; 1st Defendant: Ho Yin Man; 2nd Defendant: Stereo Limited; 3rd Defendant: Fook Tai Investment Company Limited; 4th Defendant: Yam Sam Leung; 5th Defendant: Wealthy Channel Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2018
- Case Number
- HCA92/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (property/constructive Trust Dispute) / Chambers Application/summons to Set Aside Default Judgment and to Withdraw Admissions (application to Withdraw Acknowledgment of Service and Admissions)
- Outcome
- D1's summons dismissed in its entirety; default judgment and judgment on admissions stand
- Legal Topics
- Service of Process, Default Judgment, Withdrawal of Acknowledgment of Service, Setting Aside Judgment on Admissions, Constructive Trust, Statute of Frauds/disposition of Land
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Huang Kai Chiun Dorothy
Plaintiff (executrix of the Estate of Patrick Hung Hing Yu)
Patrick Hung Hing Yu
Original Plaintiff (deceased)
Ho Yin Man
1st Defendant
Stereo Limited
2nd Defendant
Fook Tai Investment Company Limited
3rd Defendant
Yam Sam Leung
4th Defendant
Wealthy Channel Limited
5th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (property/constructive Trust Dispute) / Chambers Application/summons to Set Aside Default Judgment and to Withdraw Admissions (application to Withdraw Acknowledgment of Service and Admissions)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the writ was properly served on the first defendant
- 2 Whether the acknowledgment of service should be set aside
- 3 Whether the default judgment entered against the first defendant should be set aside under Order 19 rule 9
Ratio Decidendi
The summons to set aside the default judgment and to withdraw the 8 June 2007 admissions is dismissed: D1 had notice of the proceedings in 2007 and made multiple court filings and admissions then; his belated change of story after the deceased's death lacks credibility and contemporaneous support, his delay was inordinate and unjustified and would cause prejudice to the plaintiff; accordingly there is no real prospect of success sufficient to set aside the default judgment or allow withdrawal of admissions.
Court Disposition
D1's summons dismissed in its entirety; default judgment and judgment on admissions stand
Orders
- D1's summons dated 12 July 2017 dismissed
- Order nisi as to costs: D1 to pay plaintiff's costs of and incidental to D1's summons, to be taxed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment