RE: LEUNG CHI WANG and EX-PARTE: CALTEX OIL HONG KONG LTD., A JUDGMENT CREDITOR
The bankruptcy orders were annulled because the petitioner failed to comply with rule 46(2) by not attempting service at an address of which it had full and actual knowledge (the new/business address), and the petitioner misled the court in affirmations by omitting material facts (the removal notice), so the court would not have granted leave to file or substituted service and the bankruptcy orders ought not to have been made.
- Citation
- RE: LEUNG CHI WANG and EX-PARTE: CALTEX OIL HONG KONG LTD., A JUDGMENT CREDITOR
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor / Petitioner: Caltex Oil Hong Kong Limited; Debtor / Applicant to Annul: Yau Chi Hang; Debtor / Applicant to Annul: Leung Chi Wang; Debtor / Applicant to Annul: Mak Tsz Lok; Official Receiver (interested Party): Official Receiver's Office
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 May 2001
- Case Number
- HCB4396/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Application to Annul Bankruptcy Orders (post Bankruptcy Order Hearing)
- Outcome
- Bankruptcy orders against Yau Chi Hang, Leung Chi Wang and Mak Tsz Lok annulled
- Legal Topics
- Service of Statutory Demand, Substituted Service, Annulment of Bankruptcy Order, Proof of Service, Misleading Affidavits
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Caltex Oil Hong Kong Limited
Judgment Creditor / Petitioner
Yau Chi Hang
Debtor / Applicant to Annul
Leung Chi Wang
Debtor / Applicant to Annul
Mak Tsz Lok
Debtor / Applicant to Annul
Official Receiver's Office
Official Receiver (interested Party)
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Application to Annul Bankruptcy Orders (post Bankruptcy Order Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory demand and bankruptcy petition were properly served in compliance with rule 46(2) of the Bankruptcy Rules
- 2 Whether substituted service and leave to file the petition should have been granted under rule 49(9) given the material facts
- 3 Whether the petitioner misled the court by omitting to disclose the debtor's known new address, thereby vitiating the grant of the bankruptcy order
Ratio Decidendi
The bankruptcy orders were annulled because the petitioner failed to comply with rule 46(2) by not attempting service at an address of which it had full and actual knowledge (the new/business address), and the petitioner misled the court in affirmations by omitting material facts (the removal notice), so the court would not have granted leave to file or substituted service and the bankruptcy orders ought not to have been made.
Court Disposition
Bankruptcy orders against Yau Chi Hang, Leung Chi Wang and Mak Tsz Lok annulled
Orders
- Bankruptcy orders made on 21 March 2001 against Yau Chi Hang, Leung Chi Wang and Mak Tsz Lok are annulled
- Order nisi that Caltex Oil Hong Kong Limited pay the costs of these bankruptcy proceedings and of the annulment applications, including the costs of the Official Receiver, with a Certificate for Counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment