SETO WAI LEUNG BENNY v. SE TO SHUK YEE AND OTHERS
On the evidence the Will was validly executed and the 1st Defendant had knowledge of the Will yet procured the grant and disposed of estate assets without authority; accordingly the Grant issued to the 1st Defendant is revoked, the Will is propounded in solemn form, assets received or acquired by the 1st Defendant are held on trust and vest in the Plaintiff as administrator, the 1st Defendant must account and deliver assets, and the Plaintiff is appointed administrator with dispensation of security; costs against the 1st Defendant are awarded on an indemnity basis.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 2673
- Parties
- Plaintiff: SETO WAI LEUNG BENNY; 1st Defendant: SE-TO SHUK YEE; 2nd Defendant: SETO SHUK FUN CHRISTINE; 3rd Defendant: SE-TO PUI LUM formerly known as SE-TO SHUK PUI FANNY; 4th Defendant: SETO WAI YIP
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 December 2018
- Case Number
- HCAP18/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Action / Judgment
- Outcome
- Grant of Letters of Administration HCAG007934/2011 to 1st Defendant revoked; Will propounded in solemn form; all assets and proceeds held or acquired by 1st Defendant to be held on trust for and vested in the estate and vested in Plaintiff as administrator; Plaintiff appointed administrator with dispensation of...
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Letters of Administration, Propounding a Will in Solemn Form, Appointment of Administrator, Vesting Orders of Misappropriated Assets, Accounting by Administrator/administratrix, Indemnity Costs, Dispensation of Security
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SETO WAI LEUNG BENNY
Plaintiff
SE-TO SHUK YEE
1st Defendant
SETO SHUK FUN CHRISTINE
2nd Defendant
SE-TO PUI LUM formerly known as SE-TO SHUK PUI FANNY
3rd Defendant
SETO WAI YIP
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate Action / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Will was validly executed and should be propounded in solemn form
- 2 Whether the 1st Defendant procured the grant of letters of administration by fraud or without knowledge of the Will
- 3 Whether the grant of letters of administration issued to the 1st Defendant should be revoked
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence the Will was validly executed and the 1st Defendant had knowledge of the Will yet procured the grant and disposed of estate assets without authority; accordingly the Grant issued to the 1st Defendant is revoked, the Will is propounded in solemn form, assets received or acquired by the 1st Defendant are held on trust and vest in the Plaintiff as administrator, the 1st Defendant must account and deliver assets, and the Plaintiff is appointed administrator with dispensation of security; costs against the 1st Defendant are awarded on an indemnity basis.
Court Disposition
Grant of Letters of Administration HCAG007934/2011 to 1st Defendant revoked; Will propounded in solemn form; all assets and proceeds held or acquired by 1st Defendant to be held on trust for and vested in the estate and vested in Plaintiff as administrator; Plaintiff appointed administrator with dispensation of...
Orders
- The grant of Letters of Administration to the estate of the Deceased (Grant No HCAG007934/2011) issued to the 1st Defendant be revoked
- The 1st Defendant do hold all assets and/or properties which devolve upon her or which she administers in her capacity as the purported administratrix of the Deceased's estate by reason of the Letters of Administration issued to her, including but not limited to all cash, the sales proceeds of the Arts Mansion...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment