HUNG LING CHUN FELICIA AND ANOTHER v. CHOW YUNG FONG AND ANOTHER
Although the 2nd defendant demonstrated a defence with a real prospect of success, the court refused to set aside the default judgment because, on weighing all relevant circumstances, the very lengthy delay, unsatisfactory explanations for default and delay, and substantial prejudice to the plaintiff (including the death of the key witness and consequences of intervening bankruptcy/receiving orders and third party interests) made it unjust to reopen the judgment.
- Citation
- HUNG LING CHUN FELICIA AND ANOTHER v. CHOW YUNG FONG AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff (appointed to Represent Estate of Young Bing Ching Albert, Deceased): Hung Ling Chun Felicia; Deceased Plaintiff: Young Bing Ching Albert; 1st Defendant: Chow Yung Fong; 2nd Defendant: Ikawa Trust Co. (Hong Kong)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2001
- Case Number
- HCA10172/1994
- Procedural Posture
- Civil — Application to Set Aside Default Judgment (appeal) / Appeal to Recorder in Court of First Instance (in Chambers) From Master Souza's Dismissal of Summons to Set Aside Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; default judgment upheld and not set aside
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Default Judgment, Guarantee Liability, Dishonoured Cheque/security Cheque, Partnership Liability, Receiving Order/bankruptcy, Delay and Prejudice in Civil Procedure
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hung Ling Chun Felicia
Plaintiff (appointed to Represent Estate of Young Bing Ching Albert, Deceased)
Young Bing Ching Albert
Deceased Plaintiff
Chow Yung Fong
1st Defendant
Ikawa Trust Co. (Hong Kong)
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil — Application to Set Aside Default Judgment (appeal) / Appeal to Recorder in Court of First Instance (in Chambers) From Master Souza's Dismissal of Summons to Set Aside Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a defendant showing a defence with a real prospect of success is automatically entitled to have a default judgment set aside
- 2 Whether the 2nd defendant was bound as guarantor given the available documentary and circumstantial evidence
- 3 Whether the court may refuse to set aside a default judgment despite merit in the defence because of delay and prejudice to the plaintiff and third parties
Ratio Decidendi
Although the 2nd defendant demonstrated a defence with a real prospect of success, the court refused to set aside the default judgment because, on weighing all relevant circumstances, the very lengthy delay, unsatisfactory explanations for default and delay, and substantial prejudice to the plaintiff (including the death of the key witness and consequences of intervening bankruptcy/receiving orders and third party interests) made it unjust to reopen the judgment.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; default judgment upheld and not set aside
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Order nisi that the 2nd defendant pay the plaintiff the costs of and occasioned by this appeal, to be taxed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment