JOY RICH DEVELOPMENT LTD (In liquidation) v. FAMEWAY FINANCE LTD AND ANOTHER
Costs were ordered to follow the event: the receiving party for Lau’s application was varied to the Chen Sisters; Fameway was ordered to pay the Chen Sisters the costs of Fameway’s application; Fameway was ordered to pay the Chen Sisters the costs of the Order 13 application incurred after 17 February 2023; and the costs were summarily assessed at HK$500,000 for the Order 13 and Fameway applications combined and HK$200,000 for Lau’s application, with certificates for two counsel where stated.
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 3610
- Parties
- Plaintiff in HCA 510/2012; 1st Defendant in HCA 1497/2022: Fameway Finance Limited; Defendant in HCA 510/2012; Plaintiff in HCA 1497/2022: Joy Rich Development Limited (In liquidation); 2nd Defendant in HCA 1497/2022: Liu Yi Dong (劉益東) (also known as Lau Kwok Wah Benjamin or Ben Lau)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2024
- Case Number
- HCA1497/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Applications and Costs Proceedings / Decision on Costs Following Order 13 and Strike‑out Applications
- Outcome
- Costs orders made in favour of the Chen Sisters against Fameway and Lau as specified below
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Default Judgment, Order 13 Application, Costs Nisi, Summary Assessment of Costs, Strike‑out Applications
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fameway Finance Limited
Plaintiff in HCA 510/2012; 1st Defendant in HCA 1497/2022
Joy Rich Development Limited (In liquidation)
Defendant in HCA 510/2012; Plaintiff in HCA 1497/2022
Liu Yi Dong (劉益東) (also known as Lau Kwok Wah Benjamin or Ben Lau)
2nd Defendant in HCA 1497/2022
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Applications and Costs Proceedings / Decision on Costs Following Order 13 and Strike‑out Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the costs order nisi in respect of Lau's application should be varied so the receiving party is the Chen Sisters rather than Joy Rich
- 2 Who should pay the costs of Fameway’s strike‑out application
- 3 The start date for Fameway's liability for costs of the Order 13 application
Ratio Decidendi
Costs were ordered to follow the event: the receiving party for Lau’s application was varied to the Chen Sisters; Fameway was ordered to pay the Chen Sisters the costs of Fameway’s application; Fameway was ordered to pay the Chen Sisters the costs of the Order 13 application incurred after 17 February 2023; and the costs were summarily assessed at HK$500,000 for the Order 13 and Fameway applications combined and HK$200,000 for Lau’s application, with certificates for two counsel where stated.
Court Disposition
Costs orders made in favour of the Chen Sisters against Fameway and Lau as specified below
Orders
- Vary the costs order nisi in respect of Lau’s application so that the receiving party is the Chen Sisters; Chen Sisters to receive the costs of Lau’s application with a certificate for two counsel to be summarily assessed
- Fameway Finance Limited to pay to the Chen Sisters the costs of Fameway’s application with a certificate for two counsel to be summarily assessed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment