賴玫霞 對 衞達保安有限公司
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to produce the hearing transcript or sufficient evidence to show the settlement was not voluntary and the appropriate remedy for an alleged involuntary settlement is to commence civil proceedings to set it aside.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 2024
- Parties
- Applicant (appellant): Lai Mui Ha; Respondent (defendant): ISS Adams Secuforce Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 August 2023
- Case Number
- HCLA17/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Labour Tribunal / Labour and Welfare Tribunal (labour) / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Settlement, Duress, Leave to Appeal, Costs, Setting Aside Settlement
- Source Language
- CH
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lai Mui Ha
Applicant (appellant)
ISS Adams Secuforce Limited
Respondent (defendant)
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Labour Tribunal / Labour and Welfare Tribunal (labour) / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the settlement reached before the Labour Tribunal was procured by pressure and therefore not voluntary
- 2 Whether the Court should grant leave to appeal against the settlement without a hearing transcript or supporting evidence
- 3 What is the appropriate remedy if a settlement is said to be involuntary
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to produce the hearing transcript or sufficient evidence to show the settlement was not voluntary and the appropriate remedy for an alleged involuntary settlement is to commence civil proceedings to set it aside.
Court Disposition
leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment