WONG SIU CHING v. LAI YAU YAN MICHAEL
The Presiding Officer's refusal to re-open and re-hear the claim was within the scope of his discretionary powers and was not shown to be such that no reasonable tribunal could have made it; therefore the High Court will not interfere and the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- WONG SIU CHING v. LAI YAU YAN MICHAEL
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Wong Siu Ching; Applicant/defendant: Lai Yau Yan, Michael
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 5 January 1984
- Case Number
- HCLA47/1983
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Tribunal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Severance Pay, Arrears of Wages, Review of Tribunal Decision, Presumption of Redundancy, Exercise of Discretion, Jurisdiction and Appealability
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wong Siu Ching
Respondent/claimant
Lai Yau Yan, Michael
Applicant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Labour Tribunal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Presiding Officer should have exercised his discretion under s.31 to re-open and re-hear the claim
- 2 Whether refusal to grant review was unreasonable such that an appellate court should intervene
- 3 Whether appellant was denied the opportunity to present evidence to rebut the presumption of redundancy
Ratio Decidendi
The Presiding Officer's refusal to re-open and re-hear the claim was within the scope of his discretionary powers and was not shown to be such that no reasonable tribunal could have made it; therefore the High Court will not interfere and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment