S.H. CHAN & CO. v. D.S. CHEUNG & CO.

S.H. CHAN & CO. v. D.S. CHEUNG & CO.

The court found the letter on firm stationery, the firm’s prior dealings with the client, the wording ('we act for' and repeated first‑person references) and a subsequent firm letter demonstrated ostensible authority such that the undertaking bound D.S. Cheung & Co.; the undertaking satisfied the requirements articulated in United Bank of Kuwait v. Hammond; no real defence or triable issue existed and summary judgment was properly entered by the registrar.

Citation
S.H. CHAN & CO. v. D.S. CHEUNG & CO.
Parties
Plaintiff: S.H. Chan & Co.; Defendant: D.S. Cheung & Co.
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
13 February 1999
Case Number
HCA3312/1998
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Summary Judgment / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Undertakings by Solicitors, Ostensible Authority, Enforcement of Undertakings, Inherent Jurisdiction
Source Language
EN
Civil Procedure Legal Professional Regulation Contract Summary Judgment Undertakings by Solicitors Ostensible Authority Enforcement of Undertakings Inherent Jurisdiction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

S.H. Chan & Co.

Plaintiff

D.S. Cheung & Co.

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Summary Judgment / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the letter constituted an undertaking given by the defendant firm as solicitors
  2. 2 Whether the consultant solicitor had actual, implied or ostensible authority to give the undertaking
  3. 3 Whether there were triable issues sufficient to defeat summary judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the letter on firm stationery, the firm’s prior dealings with the client, the wording ('we act for' and repeated first‑person references) and a subsequent firm letter demonstrated ostensible authority such that the undertaking bound D.S. Cheung & Co.; the undertaking satisfied the requirements articulated in United Bank of Kuwait v. Hammond; no real defence or triable issue existed and summary judgment was properly entered by the registrar.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Summary judgment affirmed