FAMEWAY FINANCE LTD v. JOY RICH DEVELOPMENT LTD (In liquidation)

FAMEWAY FINANCE LTD v. JOY RICH DEVELOPMENT LTD (In liquidation)

The Default Judgment was set aside because Joy Rich established a defence with a real prospect of success that Lau, as shadow director, breached fiduciary duties and that the Fameway Loan and Mortgage were entered for an improper purpose or without authority; attribution and public policy issues are fact-sensitive and do not presently bar relief; restitutio in integrum does not automatically preclude rescission where defendant wrongdoing prevents restitution; delay did not produce exceptional prejudice to justify refusing relief; accordingly the strike-out and dismissal applications against the SOC failed on the present material.

Citation
[2024] HKCFI 2204
Parties
Plaintiff in HCA 510/2012; 1st Defendant in HCA 1497/2022: Fameway Finance Limited; Defendant in HCA 510/2012 (in Liquidation); Plaintiff in HCA 1497/2022: Joy Rich Development Limited; 2nd Defendant in HCA 1497/2022: Liu Yi Dong (aka Lau Kwok Wah Benjamin / Ben Lau)
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
28 August 2024
Case Number
HCA510/2012
Procedural Posture
Civil — Company/winding Up Disputes and Related Claims / Interlocutory Applications (order 13 Application to Set Aside Default Judgment; Strike Out Applications)
Outcome
Default judgment set aside; Fameway's strike-out application not granted (no order made); Lau's strike-out application dismissed; costs directions made
Legal Topics
Shadow Director, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Rescission/voidable Transactions, Set Aside Default Judgment (o.13), Restitutio in Integrum, Attribution of Knowledge/agency, Abuse of Process, Strike Out
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fameway Finance Limited

Plaintiff in HCA 510/2012; 1st Defendant in HCA 1497/2022

Joy Rich Development Limited

Defendant in HCA 510/2012 (in Liquidation); Plaintiff in HCA 1497/2022

Liu Yi Dong (aka Lau Kwok Wah Benjamin / Ben Lau)

2nd Defendant in HCA 1497/2022

Procedural Posture

Civil — Company/winding Up Disputes and Related Claims / Interlocutory Applications (order 13 Application to Set Aside Default Judgment; Strike Out Applications)

  1. 1 Whether Joy Rich has a real prospect of establishing that Lau, as a shadow director, breached fiduciary duties and that the Fameway Loan and Mortgage are void/voidable or entered without authority
  2. 2 Whether the knowledge or misconduct of directing minds (Lau and the Chen sisters) is attributable to Joy Rich for the purpose of defeating relief
  3. 3 Whether equitable bars (clean hands) or restitutio in integrum/preclusion by inability to restore the loan proceeds prevent setting aside the Default Judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The Default Judgment was set aside because Joy Rich established a defence with a real prospect of success that Lau, as shadow director, breached fiduciary duties and that the Fameway Loan and Mortgage were entered for an improper purpose or without authority; attribution and public policy issues are fact-sensitive and do not presently bar relief; restitutio in integrum does not automatically preclude rescission where defendant wrongdoing prevents restitution; delay did not produce exceptional prejudice to justify refusing relief; accordingly the strike-out and dismissal applications against the SOC failed on the present material.

Court Disposition

Default judgment set aside; Fameway's strike-out application not granted (no order made); Lau's strike-out application dismissed; costs directions made

Orders

  • Default Judgment of 29 October 2012 set aside
  • No order made on Fameway's summons to strike out the Statement of Claim