HKSAR v. SHAFIQUE MOHAMMAD

HKSAR v. SHAFIQUE MOHAMMAD

The court held that a total sentence of 15 months imprisonment was not excessive and was an appropriate sentence for the two offences on the facts presented, and thus dismissed the appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
HKSAR v. SHAFIQUE MOHAMMAD
Parties
Respondent: HKSAR; Appellant: SHAFIQUE MOHAMMAD
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
14 July 2011
Case Number
HCMA418/2011
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Appeal Against Sentence; Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; sentence upheld.
Legal Topics
False Representation, Use of Another Person's Identity Card, Sentencing, Guilty Plea
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Immigration Law False Representation Use of Another Person's Identity Card Sentencing Guilty Plea

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HKSAR

Respondent

SHAFIQUE MOHAMMAD

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Appeal Against Sentence; Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of 15 months imprisonment was excessive
  2. 2 Appropriate aggregate sentence for concurrent convictions for false representation and using another person's identity card
  3. 3 Weight to be given to guilty plea and mitigating factors

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that a total sentence of 15 months imprisonment was not excessive and was an appropriate sentence for the two offences on the facts presented, and thus dismissed the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; sentence upheld.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Sentence of 15 months imprisonment upheld