HKSAR v. SHAFIQUE MOHAMMAD
The court held that a total sentence of 15 months imprisonment was not excessive and was an appropriate sentence for the two offences on the facts presented, and thus dismissed the appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- HKSAR v. SHAFIQUE MOHAMMAD
- Parties
- Respondent: HKSAR; Appellant: SHAFIQUE MOHAMMAD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2011
- Case Number
- HCMA418/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Appeal Against Sentence; Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; sentence upheld.
- Legal Topics
- False Representation, Use of Another Person's Identity Card, Sentencing, Guilty Plea
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HKSAR
Respondent
SHAFIQUE MOHAMMAD
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Appeal Against Sentence; Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 15 months imprisonment was excessive
- 2 Appropriate aggregate sentence for concurrent convictions for false representation and using another person's identity card
- 3 Weight to be given to guilty plea and mitigating factors
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that a total sentence of 15 months imprisonment was not excessive and was an appropriate sentence for the two offences on the facts presented, and thus dismissed the appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; sentence upheld.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Sentence of 15 months imprisonment upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
bjbj HCMA 418/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 418 OF 2011 (ON APPEAL FROM STCC 1344 OF 2011) ____________ BETWEEN HKSAR Respondent and SHAFIQUE MOHAMMAD Appellant ____________ Before: The Honourable Mrs Justice V. Bokhary in Court Date of Hearing: 14 July 2011 Date of Judgment: 14 July 2011 _______________ J U D G M E N T _______________ The Appellant pleaded guilty in a Magistrates Court to two charges laid against him. One was of making a false representation to an Immigration Assistant and the other was of using an identity card relating to another person. He admitted the fact set out in the brief facts produced by the prosecution which read as follows:- On 15 March 2011, the defendant presented for departure clearance at airport control point on strength of a Pakistani passport no. UC4118491 (hereinafter called as ) in name of KHAN, ABDUL SHAKOOR with date of birth as 5 February 1973 and a Hong Kong identity card (HKIC) no. K289803(9) (hereinafter as ) under the same identity. As the photos on P1 and P2 were found different from the defendant s facial appearance. He was detained for further investigated. 2. Under caution, the defendant admitted that he was a Pakistani known as MOHAMMAD SHAFIQUE with date of birth as 14 April 1964. As he wanted to return to Pakistan, he asked a middleman to arrange a passport for him at a cost of HK$5,000. Upon subsequent receipt of P1 and P2, he was aware that all the personal particulars recorded thereon did not relate to him and he did not know the rightful holder. On 15 March 2011, armed with P1 and P2, he presented for departure clearance in Hong Kong upon which he falsely represented the bogus identity to an Immigration Assistant (subject matter of both charges). The defendant was intercepted and arrested. The Appellant was sentenced to 15 months imprisonment. That sentence is made up of concurrent terms of 12 months on the false representation charge and 15 months on the identity card relating to another person charge. He now appeals against sentence. I have listened with care everything that has been urged on me by the Appellant and I have also heard the submission by Ms Leung for the Respondent. In my view, the total sentence of 15 months imprisonment cannot be regarded as too severe. It is an appropriate sentence for the two offences to which the Appellant has pleaded guilty. The appeal is therefore dismissed. (V. Bokhary) Judge of the Court of First Instance High Court Appellant in person Ms Peggy Leung, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent PAGE - A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V 1udk 1udk hrLB h.>h gda` gdYh hVLw h-}Q eqYeTOK hI~- hI~- }xsnid h6,l hI~- hI~- hrLB hrLB [Content_Types].xml Iw}, $yi} _rels/.rels theme/theme/themeManager.xml K Y, sQ}# theme/theme/theme1.xml w toc'v )I`n 3Vq%'#q x}r :\TZaG I u3 L+M2 e\O* $*c? )6-r IqbJ#x ,AGm T[XF64 E)`# R>QD =(K& =al- 4vfa 0%M0 theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.rels 5 6?$Q K(M&$R(.1 [Content_Types].xmlPK _rels/.relsPK theme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> <a:clrMap xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" bg1="lt1" tx1="dk1" bg2="lt2" tx2="dk2" accent1="accent1" accent2="accent2" accent3="accent3" accent4="accent4" accent5="accent5" accent6="accent6" hlink="hlink" folHlink="folHlink"/> i$&H @d/Z o!@R< 5%4j 5%4j >~t6 HCMA.dot Tai Yin Sheung Lilian Microsoft Office Word Judiciary Hong Kong Title <b:Sources SelectedStyle="\APA.XSL" StyleName="APA" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"></b:Sources> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> <ds:datastoreItem ds:itemID="{4D69807A-2097-404D-8DA4-BDD4D7ACD7F5}" xmlns:ds="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/customXml"><ds:schemaRefs><ds:schemaRef ds:uri="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"/></ds:schemaRefs></ds:datastoreItem> Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8