YEE TUNG-SING, DEREK AND OTHERS v. KINGSTON ENTERTAINMENT LTD. AND ANOTHER

YEE TUNG-SING, DEREK AND OTHERS v. KINGSTON ENTERTAINMENT LTD. AND ANOTHER

The judge concluded there are genuine triable issues — including disputed characterization of investments (loan v share subscription), alleged concealed/beneficial shareholdings and disputed signatures — such that an Order 14 default judgment was inappropriate; accordingly the Master's entry of judgment under Order 14 was set aside and a rehearing ordered.

Citation
YEE TUNG-SING, DEREK AND OTHERS v. KINGSTON ENTERTAINMENT LTD. AND ANOTHER
Parties
1st Plaintiff: YEE TUNG-SING, DEREK; 2nd Plaintiff: TO CHING-CHING, GEMMA; 3rd Plaintiff: LUK KAI-MING, STEPHEN; 4th Plaintiff: TONG SIU-WAN, RAYMOND; 5th Plaintiff: NG YUI-MING, SAMSON; 1st Defendant: KINGSTON ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: CHEUNG MAN-KWONG, JOE
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
17 June 2002
Case Number
HCA5069/2001
Procedural Posture
Civil: Commercial/shareholder Dispute / Appeal/rehearing From Master's Refusal to Grant Leave to Defend and Entry of Judgment Under Order 14
Outcome
Master's Order 14 judgment set aside; matter to proceed by way of rehearing
Legal Topics
Share Allotment, Shareholder Loans, Beneficial Ownership, Repudiation of Agreement, Summary Judgment (order 14), Evidentiary Dispute Over Signatures
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

YEE TUNG-SING, DEREK

1st Plaintiff

TO CHING-CHING, GEMMA

2nd Plaintiff

LUK KAI-MING, STEPHEN

3rd Plaintiff

TONG SIU-WAN, RAYMOND

4th Plaintiff

NG YUI-MING, SAMSON

5th Plaintiff

KINGSTON ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED

1st Defendant

CHEUNG MAN-KWONG, JOE

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil: Commercial/shareholder Dispute / Appeal/rehearing From Master's Refusal to Grant Leave to Defend and Entry of Judgment Under Order 14

  1. 1 Whether the investments were subscriptions for shares or loans
  2. 2 Whether clause 15 of the agreement precludes characterization as share subscriptions
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiffs were beneficial/secret shareholders or mere creditors

Ratio Decidendi

The judge concluded there are genuine triable issues — including disputed characterization of investments (loan v share subscription), alleged concealed/beneficial shareholdings and disputed signatures — such that an Order 14 default judgment was inappropriate; accordingly the Master's entry of judgment under Order 14 was set aside and a rehearing ordered.

Court Disposition

Master's Order 14 judgment set aside; matter to proceed by way of rehearing

Orders

  • Set aside the Master's decision entering judgment under Order 14
  • 1st and 2nd Defendants to file an amended statement of defence within 14 days from date of judgment