HWANG DA-LIN AND ANOTHER v. WONG CHUNG KEUNG AND OTHERS
The court accepted in principle that the company could satisfy the purchase by assigning the Lap Fai units to the Petitioners provided measures are taken to protect the pari passu rights of unsecured creditors (notably payment to a special account and agreed safeguards); however no final order was made because parties must consider and agree draft terms and the 2nd Respondent was given opportunity to adduce evidence which he failed to do.
- Citation
- HWANG DA-LIN AND ANOTHER v. WONG CHUNG KEUNG AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Petitioner: HWANG DA-LIN; 2nd Petitioner: WONG SHI HOI, CARSON; 1st Respondent: WONG CHUNG KEUNG sued as the sole executor of the estate of WONG CHING MAN, deceased; 2nd Respondent: WONG CHUNG KEUNG; 3rd Respondent: TAI LAP INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2001
- Case Number
- HCCW643/1996
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Winding Up No. 643 of 1996 / Adjourned Hearing of a Summons to Implement Prior Court Order; Decision in Chambers
- Outcome
- No final order made. Court indicated in principle approval of assignment subject to safeguards to protect unsecured creditors and adjourned the matter for parties to consider and file a draft order; liberty to restore.
- Legal Topics
- Share Purchase Order, Receivership, Assignment of Property, Creditor Priorities, Winding Up, Valuation of Assets
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HWANG DA-LIN
1st Petitioner
WONG SHI HOI, CARSON
2nd Petitioner
WONG CHUNG KEUNG sued as the sole executor of the estate of WONG CHING MAN, deceased
1st Respondent
WONG CHUNG KEUNG
2nd Respondent
TAI LAP INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Companies Winding Up No. 643 of 1996 / Adjourned Hearing of a Summons to Implement Prior Court Order; Decision in Chambers
Legal Issues
- 1 How the court-ordered purchase of petitioners' shares is to be effected
- 2 Whether assignment of charged property (Lap Fai units) to petitioners can satisfy the purchase without preferring unsecured creditors
- 3 Whether payment into a special account can secure pari passu rights of unsecured creditors
Ratio Decidendi
The court accepted in principle that the company could satisfy the purchase by assigning the Lap Fai units to the Petitioners provided measures are taken to protect the pari passu rights of unsecured creditors (notably payment to a special account and agreed safeguards); however no final order was made because parties must consider and agree draft terms and the 2nd Respondent was given opportunity to adduce evidence which he failed to do.
Court Disposition
No final order made. Court indicated in principle approval of assignment subject to safeguards to protect unsecured creditors and adjourned the matter for parties to consider and file a draft order; liberty to restore.
Orders
- Hearing adjourned
- No final order made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment