LIU JINJING, THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF LEUNG WING KEUNG, DECEASED AND ANOTHER v. WAI HING ENTERPRISES LTD
The administratrix's statutory title did not entitle her to mandatory registration because Articles 5(a), 6 and 12 of the Articles of Association created enforceable pre-emption rights preserved by s160 CO and the directors lawfully declined registration in good faith and in the interests of the company; the administratrix also failed to comply with the Article 6 transfer notice requirement specifying fair value; estoppel by convention and Clause 3(cc) did not invalidate the articles or oblige registration; therefore the application under s159 CO was not well-founded and is dismissed.
- Citation
- LIU JINJING, THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF LEUNG WING KEUNG, DECEASED AND ANOTHER v. WAI HING ENTERPRISES LTD
- Parties
- Plaintiff (1) Administratrix of the Estate of Leung Wing Keung (with Will Annexed); (2) Personal Capacity as Sole Beneficiary of Residuary Estate: Madam Liu Jinjing; Defendant (private Company Limited by Shares): The Company
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 December 2015
- Case Number
- HCMP2915/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons Under Companies Ordinance Relating to Registration of Shareholder / Judgment at First Instance (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Originating summons dismissed; application under s159 Companies Ordinance not well-founded
- Legal Topics
- Share Registration, Pre Emption Rights, Directors Discretion, Administratrix Entitlement, Estoppel by Convention, Construction of Articles of Association, Table a Interpretation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Madam Liu Jinjing
Plaintiff (1) Administratrix of the Estate of Leung Wing Keung (with Will Annexed); (2) Personal Capacity as Sole Beneficiary of Residuary Estate
The Company
Defendant (private Company Limited by Shares)
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons Under Companies Ordinance Relating to Registration of Shareholder / Judgment at First Instance (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the administratrix is entitled as of right to be registered as member despite articles providing pre-emption and directors' discretion
- 2 Whether the beneficiary in her personal capacity is entitled to be registered as member
- 3 Whether Articles 5(a), 6 and 12 of the Articles of Association and Table A operate to permit refusal of registration
Ratio Decidendi
The administratrix's statutory title did not entitle her to mandatory registration because Articles 5(a), 6 and 12 of the Articles of Association created enforceable pre-emption rights preserved by s160 CO and the directors lawfully declined registration in good faith and in the interests of the company; the administratrix also failed to comply with the Article 6 transfer notice requirement specifying fair value; estoppel by convention and Clause 3(cc) did not invalidate the articles or oblige registration; therefore the application under s159 CO was not well-founded and is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Originating summons dismissed; application under s159 Companies Ordinance not well-founded
Orders
- Dismissal of the originating summons.
- Order nisi that costs of the originating summons and costs of and incidental to its amendment shall be borne by the plaintiffs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment