LAM SIU LEUNG AND ANOTHER v. KOOVER WOOLLEN KNITTING FACTORY LTD. AND OTHERS
The court directed the appointment of a jointly retained independent accountant (by agreement or court appointment) to value the petitioners' shares as at 15 October 1998 on a net assets basis without a minority discount, with full access to company books and addition of sums misappropriated by the 4th respondent back to company assets; procedural steps and timelines for selection, investigations, auction and completion were ordered and the petitioners were ordered to pay the 3rd respondent's costs to be taxed if not agreed.
- Citation
- LAM SIU LEUNG AND ANOTHER v. KOOVER WOOLLEN KNITTING FACTORY LTD. AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Petitioner: LAM SIU LEUNG; 2nd Petitioner: YUEN POON HING; 1st Respondent: KOOVER WOOLLEN KNITTING FACTORY LIMITED; 2nd Respondent: HOOVER WOOLLEN KNITWEARS LIMITED; 3rd Respondent: CHINA WOOLLEN KNITWEARS LIMITED; 4th Respondent: YUEN KWING YEUNG; 5th Respondent: YUEN CHI HUNG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2000
- Case Number
- HCMP6321/1998
- Procedural Posture
- Section 168 a Petition Under Companies Ordinance (miscellaneous Proceedings) / Directions Stage
- Outcome
- Court issued directions appointing an independent accountant and setting valuation methodology, access to documents, procedural timelines for valuation and sale, and ordered petitioners to pay the 3rd respondent's costs to be taxed if not agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Share Valuation, Appointment of Expert, Minority Shareholder Rights, Misappropriation, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LAM SIU LEUNG
1st Petitioner
YUEN POON HING
2nd Petitioner
KOOVER WOOLLEN KNITTING FACTORY LIMITED
1st Respondent
HOOVER WOOLLEN KNITWEARS LIMITED
2nd Respondent
CHINA WOOLLEN KNITWEARS LIMITED
3rd Respondent
YUEN KWING YEUNG
4th Respondent
YUEN CHI HUNG
5th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Section 168 a Petition Under Companies Ordinance (miscellaneous Proceedings) / Directions Stage
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an independent accountant should be appointed to value the petitioners' shares
- 2 Appropriate basis and date for valuation (net assets basis, no minority discount, valuation date)
- 3 Whether misappropriated sums should be added back to company assets
Ratio Decidendi
The court directed the appointment of a jointly retained independent accountant (by agreement or court appointment) to value the petitioners' shares as at 15 October 1998 on a net assets basis without a minority discount, with full access to company books and addition of sums misappropriated by the 4th respondent back to company assets; procedural steps and timelines for selection, investigations, auction and completion were ordered and the petitioners were ordered to pay the 3rd respondent's costs to be taxed if not agreed.
Court Disposition
Court issued directions appointing an independent accountant and setting valuation methodology, access to documents, procedural timelines for valuation and sale, and ordered petitioners to pay the 3rd respondent's costs to be taxed if not agreed.
Orders
- Petitioners and 4th/5th respondents to agree choice of accountant within 7 days
- If no agreement, each side to file list of up to 3 accountants within 14 days after the 7 day period and the Court to appoint an accountant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment