SINGH, HARJIT v. VSL HONG KONG LTD AND OTHERS
The Master allowed the late amendments because the proposed changes were arguable and relevant to a just resolution, the evidence was not new to defendants and caused no real prejudice, the delay was limited and did not disrupt the assessment, and the substantive issues (exclusion of months, notional earnings, multiplier, PSLA) were matters properly left for determination at the assessment hearing; however costs consequences flow to the applicant for making a late application.
- Citation
- SINGH, HARJIT v. VSL HONG KONG LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: SINGH, HARJIT; 1st Defendant: VSL HONG KONG LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: DRAGAGES HONG KONG LIMITED, trading as DRAGAGES-NISHIMATSU JOINT VENTURE; 3rd Defendant: NISHIMATSU CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD., trading as DRAGAGES-NISHIMATSU JOINT VENTURE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 5 July 2013
- Case Number
- HCPI153/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Assessment of Damages / Application for Leave to Amend Revised Statement of Damages and to Adduce Supplemental Witness Statements; Checklist Review Ordered
- Outcome
- Application allowed; leave granted to amend Revised Statement of Damages as per draft dated 17 June 2013 and leave to adduce supplemental witness statement and two additional witnesses; costs ordered nisi for defendants; checklist review hearing set and time for setting down extended.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Late Application, Witness Evidence, Notional Earnings, Multiplier Adjustment, PSLA
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SINGH, HARJIT
Plaintiff
VSL HONG KONG LIMITED
1st Defendant
DRAGAGES HONG KONG LIMITED, trading as DRAGAGES-NISHIMATSU JOINT VENTURE
2nd Defendant
NISHIMATSU CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD., trading as DRAGAGES-NISHIMATSU JOINT VENTURE
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Assessment of Damages / Application for Leave to Amend Revised Statement of Damages and to Adduce Supplemental Witness Statements; Checklist Review Ordered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to allow a late amendment to the Revised Statement of Damages
- 2 Whether supplemental witness statements and two new witnesses should be admitted late
- 3 Whether certain months' earnings should be excluded in calculating pre-accident average earnings
Ratio Decidendi
The Master allowed the late amendments because the proposed changes were arguable and relevant to a just resolution, the evidence was not new to defendants and caused no real prejudice, the delay was limited and did not disrupt the assessment, and the substantive issues (exclusion of months, notional earnings, multiplier, PSLA) were matters properly left for determination at the assessment hearing; however costs consequences flow to the applicant for making a late application.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; leave granted to amend Revised Statement of Damages as per draft dated 17 June 2013 and leave to adduce supplemental witness statement and two additional witnesses; costs ordered nisi for defendants; checklist review hearing set and time for setting down extended.
Orders
- Leave granted to amend the Revised Statement of Damages in terms of the draft submitted with Messrs Or & Partners' letter of 17 June 2013 (paras 1–4 of summons)
- Leave granted to adduce the plaintiff's supplemental witness statement and two additional witness statements
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment