SINO TEAM LTD. v. LEUNG FOO AND OTHERS
There were genuine disputes of fact about consideration and the circumstances of the cheque which required investigation; accordingly unconditional leave to defend was granted and it was inappropriate in this case to require payment into court as a condition for leave to defend.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- SINO TEAM LTD. v. LEUNG FOO AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Sino Team Limited; 1st Defendant: Leung Foo; 2nd Defendant: Lau Wing Wa; 3rd Defendant: Hang Sing Trading Company (a firm)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 1999
- Case Number
- HCA4462/1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action for Dishonoured Cheque / Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment in Court of First Instance (chambers)
- Outcome
- Unconditional leave to defend granted; conditional payment into court refused; specific costs orders made
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Dishonoured Cheque, Consideration, Forbearance to Sue, Leave to Defend, Costs Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sino Team Limited
Plaintiff
Leung Foo
1st Defendant
Lau Wing Wa
2nd Defendant
Hang Sing Trading Company (a firm)
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Dishonoured Cheque / Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment in Court of First Instance (chambers)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the cheque was supported by consideration (forbearance to sue Fu Lai Wah Fashions Ltd.)
- 2 Whether the plaintiff agreed to cancel the cheque
- 3 Whether there are genuine disputes of fact preventing summary judgment
Ratio Decidendi
There were genuine disputes of fact about consideration and the circumstances of the cheque which required investigation; accordingly unconditional leave to defend was granted and it was inappropriate in this case to require payment into court as a condition for leave to defend.
Court Disposition
Unconditional leave to defend granted; conditional payment into court refused; specific costs orders made
Orders
- Unconditional leave to defend granted to the defendants
- Order for costs in the cause until 21 May 1999
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
bjbj HCA 4462/1999 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO. 4462 OF 1999 BETWEEN SINO TEAM LIMITED Plaintiff and LEUNG FOO 1st Defendant LAU WING WA 2nd Defendant HANG SING TRADING COMPANY (a firm) 3rd Defendant ---------------------- Coram : Hon. Godfrey, J.A. in Chambers (sitting as an additional Judge of the Court of First Instance) Date of hearing : 27 July 1999 Date of judgment : 27 July 1999 ---------------------- J U D G M E N T ---------------------- This is an application for summary judgment in an action brought on a dishonoured cheque for $413,599.70. The defendants say that there was no consideration for the cheque and that the plaintiff has agreed to its cancellation. The plaintiff says that the consideration for the cheque was the plaintiff s forbearance to sue a company called Fu Lai Wah Fashions Ltd. for monies due to the plaintiff, and that any agreement for cancellation was dependent on the issue of a letter of credit which has not in fact been issued. There are what appear to me to be genuine disputes of fact as to whether any forbearance to sue was a forbearance at the request of the defendants, and indeed I think the circumstances in which the cheque was given do require investigation. I have considered giving leave to defend conditional on payment of the amount claimed into court, but I do not think this is a proper case for such an order. I will give unconditional leave to defend with an order for costs in the cause until 21 May 1999 (the day after the date of a letter was sent by the defendants solicitors to the plaintiff s solicitors offering to agree an order giving such leave to the defendants with an order for costs in the cause) and thereafter an order for the defendant to have their costs of this application in any event. (Gerald Godfrey) Justice of Appeal Mr. Kenneth Chik, instructed by Messrs. Chan & Wan, for the Plaintiff Mr. Anthony P.W. Cheung, instructed by Messrs. Albert K.K. Luk & Co., for the 2nd and 3rd Defendants - PAGE - @\\SSLAI\HP LaserJet 4 Plus Ne02: winspool HP LaserJet 4 Plus \\SSLAI\HP LaserJet 4 Plus \\SSLAI\HP LaserJet 4 Plus IN THE COURT OF APPEAL 199, No. Registrar, Supreme Court Normal Microsoft Word 8.0 user IN THE COURT OF APPEAL 199, No. Title _PID_GUID Microsoft Word Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8