SINO TEAM LTD. v. LEUNG FOO AND OTHERS

SINO TEAM LTD. v. LEUNG FOO AND OTHERS

There were genuine disputes of fact about consideration and the circumstances of the cheque which required investigation; accordingly unconditional leave to defend was granted and it was inappropriate in this case to require payment into court as a condition for leave to defend.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
SINO TEAM LTD. v. LEUNG FOO AND OTHERS
Parties
Plaintiff: Sino Team Limited; 1st Defendant: Leung Foo; 2nd Defendant: Lau Wing Wa; 3rd Defendant: Hang Sing Trading Company (a firm)
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
27 July 1999
Case Number
HCA4462/1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Dishonoured Cheque / Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment in Court of First Instance (chambers)
Outcome
Unconditional leave to defend granted; conditional payment into court refused; specific costs orders made
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Dishonoured Cheque, Consideration, Forbearance to Sue, Leave to Defend, Costs Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Negotiable Instruments Contract Law Costs Summary Judgment Dishonoured Cheque Consideration Forbearance to Sue +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sino Team Limited

Plaintiff

Leung Foo

1st Defendant

Lau Wing Wa

2nd Defendant

Hang Sing Trading Company (a firm)

3rd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Action for Dishonoured Cheque / Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment in Court of First Instance (chambers)

  1. 1 Whether the cheque was supported by consideration (forbearance to sue Fu Lai Wah Fashions Ltd.)
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff agreed to cancel the cheque
  3. 3 Whether there are genuine disputes of fact preventing summary judgment

Ratio Decidendi

There were genuine disputes of fact about consideration and the circumstances of the cheque which required investigation; accordingly unconditional leave to defend was granted and it was inappropriate in this case to require payment into court as a condition for leave to defend.

Court Disposition

Unconditional leave to defend granted; conditional payment into court refused; specific costs orders made

Orders

  • Unconditional leave to defend granted to the defendants
  • Order for costs in the cause until 21 May 1999