SIU LEONG CHING v. PROFESSIONAL SCAFFOLDING ENGINEERING CO LTD AND OTHERS
Court found the 1st defendant liable in negligence because although safety equipment was supplied it failed to ensure erection/installation of independent lifeline, anchorage points and safety net (non-delegable duty); the 2nd defendant was liable for breach of statutory duty as evidenced by its admitted conviction;...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- SIU LEONG CHING v. PROFESSIONAL SCAFFOLDING ENGINEERING CO LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Siu Leong Ching; 1st Defendant: Professional Scaffolding Engineering Company Limited; 2nd Defendant: Michael Chiang & Associates Limited; Third Party: Tong Yuen Kwong trading as A-TECH DESIGN & CONTRACTING CO.; Fourth Party: Yan Yip Wai trading as FOO LAI COMPANY
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 November 2004
- Case Number
- HCPI70/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Action / Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff against the 1st and 2nd defendants
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Res Ipsa Loquitur, Vicarious Liability, Breach of Statutory Duty, Damages Assessment, Non Delegable Duty
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Siu Leong Ching
Plaintiff
Professional Scaffolding Engineering Company Limited
1st Defendant
Michael Chiang & Associates Limited
2nd Defendant
Tong Yuen Kwong trading as A-TECH DESIGN & CONTRACTING CO.
Third Party
Yan Yip Wai trading as FOO LAI COMPANY
Fourth Party
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action / Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st defendant (employer) breached a non-delegable duty to provide a safe place and system of work
- 2 Whether the 2nd defendant (main contractor) was liable for breach of statutory duty under construction safety regulations and whether its conviction was relevant evidence
- 3 Causation for scaffold collapse and adequacy of safety measures (lifeline, anchorage, safety net)
Ratio Decidendi
Court found the 1st defendant liable in negligence because although safety equipment was supplied it failed to ensure erection/installation of independent lifeline, anchorage points and safety net (non-delegable duty); the 2nd defendant was liable for breach of statutory duty as evidenced by its admitted conviction; plaintiff was contributorily negligent (25%) for failing to ascertain existing dismantling steps before mounting scaffold; damages assessed and reduced accordingly.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff against the 1st and 2nd defendants
Orders
- Judgment for plaintiff in the sum of 1223310.25 HKD against both defendants jointly and severally
- Costs order nisi: defendants to pay plaintiff's costs to be taxed if not agreed; plaintiff's own costs to be taxed in accordance with Legal Aid Regulations
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment