SKYDON DEVELOPMENT LTD. v. MICRO ORGANIZATION LTD. AND OTHERS
The plaintiff's database was an original compilation involving sufficient skill, labour and judgment, the plaintiff owned the copyright as employer, the defendants reproduced the plaintiff's work as shown by convincing evidence including identical errors, the defendants' defences (lack of originality, non-ownership, public policy/government ownership, Anton Piller restraint) fail, and summary judgment is appropriate with damages to be assessed including for breach of fiduciary duty by the second and fourth defendants.
- Citation
- SKYDON DEVELOPMENT LTD. v. MICRO ORGANIZATION LTD. AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: SKYDON DEVELOPMENT LIMITED; First Defendant: MICRO ORGANIZATION LIMITED; Second Defendant: FUNG WING KAI; Third Defendant: NG YU PIK; Fourth Defendant: YAN LAI CHUI; Fifth Defendant: YIP WING HUNG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 1999
- Case Number
- HCA10588/1998
- Procedural Posture
- Copyright Infringement; Breach of Fiduciary Duties / Summary Judgment Application (decision)
- Outcome
- Summary judgment for the plaintiff; defendants' defences dismissed; damages to be assessed
- Legal Topics
- Database Copyright, Originality of Compilation, Copyright Ownership, Substantial Reproduction, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Anton Piller Order, Summary Judgment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SKYDON DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
Plaintiff
MICRO ORGANIZATION LIMITED
First Defendant
FUNG WING KAI
Second Defendant
NG YU PIK
Third Defendant
YAN LAI CHUI
Fourth Defendant
YIP WING HUNG
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Copyright Infringement; Breach of Fiduciary Duties / Summary Judgment Application (decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff's litigation database qualified for copyright protection as an original work
- 2 Whether the plaintiff was the owner of the copyright in the database
- 3 Whether the defendants substantially reproduced or copied the plaintiff's database
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff's database was an original compilation involving sufficient skill, labour and judgment, the plaintiff owned the copyright as employer, the defendants reproduced the plaintiff's work as shown by convincing evidence including identical errors, the defendants' defences (lack of originality, non-ownership, public policy/government ownership, Anton Piller restraint) fail, and summary judgment is appropriate with damages to be assessed including for breach of fiduciary duty by the second and fourth defendants.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment for the plaintiff; defendants' defences dismissed; damages to be assessed
Orders
- Judgment entered for the plaintiff on the copyright infringement claim against the defendants
- Judgment entered for the plaintiff on the claim for breach of fiduciary duties against the second and fourth defendants; damages to be assessed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment