KIM ENG SECURITIES (HONG KONG) LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE

KIM ENG SECURITIES (HONG KONG) LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE

The Court held that, on the facts found, the appellant's net commission and all income flowing from margin facilities arose in or were derived from Hong Kong: the Taxpayer's presence and activities in Hong Kong were the effective cause of the income and without those Hong Kong activities (account...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
KIM ENG SECURITIES (HONG KONG) LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
Parties
Appellant (taxpayer): Kim Eng Securities (Hong Kong) Limited; Respondent (revenue): Commissioner of Inland Revenue
Court
Court of Final Appeal
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
29 March 2007
Case Number
FACV11/2006
Procedural Posture
Final Appeal (profits Tax) / Appeal to Court of Final Appeal From Board of Review Via Court of Appeal (leap‑frog)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed in its entirety
Legal Topics
Source of Profits, Apportionment, Profits Tax (s.14 Iro), Margin Financing, Commission Sharing, Agent/principal Attribution
Source Language
en
Tax Law Revenue Law Agency Law Evidence and Procedure Source of Profits Apportionment Profits Tax (s.14 Iro) Margin Financing +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kim Eng Securities (Hong Kong) Limited

Appellant (taxpayer)

Commissioner of Inland Revenue

Respondent (revenue)

Procedural Posture

Final Appeal (profits Tax) / Appeal to Court of Final Appeal From Board of Review Via Court of Appeal (leap‑frog)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's four types of income (net commission, contango commission, sub-underwriting/commitment fee, interest from margin facilities) arose in or were derived from Hong Kong or were foreign-sourced
  2. 2 Whether income was of mixed source and, if so, whether and how apportionment should be made
  3. 3 Whether acts of foreign executing brokers should be attributed to the Hong Kong taxpayer under agency principles

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that, on the facts found, the appellant's net commission and all income flowing from margin facilities arose in or were derived from Hong Kong: the Taxpayer's presence and activities in Hong Kong were the effective cause of the income and without those Hong Kong activities (account opening/maintenance, monitoring, contractual interposition and settlement arrangements) the income would not have been earned; agency arguments attributing execution abroad to the taxpayer did not displace that conclusion; the Board of Review and Court of Appeal did not err in law and the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed in its entirety

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs to Respondent (Commissioner of Inland Revenue)