STEP BY STEP LTD AND OTHERS v. DOROTHY JANE FURNESS AND OTHERS
The appeal was allowed in part: the Masters orders limiting discovery were varied to require disclosure of specified primary transactional documents (cheque books and stubs, deposit slips, withdrawal slips, cash books, telegraphic transfer forms, confirmations, daily sales records, purchase invoices, receipts, petty cash books, contracts) for the 3rd defendant from incorporation to September 2008 and to retain the Masters limitation of audited accounts of the 3rd and 4th defendants to the end of the 2007-2008 financial year; broad audit working papers and open-ended supporting documents were refused for both defendants, and supporting accounting documents for the 4th defendant were...
- Citation
- STEP BY STEP LTD AND OTHERS v. DOROTHY JANE FURNESS AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: STEP BY STEP LIMITED; 2nd Plaintiff: NEW SUCCESS ENTERPRISES LIMITED; 3rd Plaintiff: STEP UP LIMITED; 1st Defendant: DOROTHY JANE FURNESS; 2nd Defendant: RAPHAEL HOMER ECHALUCE; 3rd Defendant: ENTERTAIN COMPANY LIMITED; 4th Defendant: MAD DOGS WANCHAI PUBLIC HOUSE LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2009
- Case Number
- HCMP842/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Discovery Appeal / Appeal From Master's Decision on Specific Discovery
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part and Master's orders varied as to scope of discovery for the 3rd defendant; other orders affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Specific Discovery, Relevance and Necessity, Equitable Tracing, Audited Accounts and Audit Working Papers, Fishing Expedition, Admission of Further Evidence on Appeal
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
STEP BY STEP LIMITED
1st Plaintiff
NEW SUCCESS ENTERPRISES LIMITED
2nd Plaintiff
STEP UP LIMITED
3rd Plaintiff
DOROTHY JANE FURNESS
1st Defendant
RAPHAEL HOMER ECHALUCE
2nd Defendant
ENTERTAIN COMPANY LIMITED
3rd Defendant
MAD DOGS WANCHAI PUBLIC HOUSE LIMITED
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Discovery Appeal / Appeal From Master's Decision on Specific Discovery
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the documents sought were relevant and necessary for fair disposal or saving costs
- 2 Whether extensive audit working papers and supporting documents should be ordered or constitute fishing
- 3 Whether discovery should extend beyond the audited year end to date
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed in part: the Masters orders limiting discovery were varied to require disclosure of specified primary transactional documents (cheque books and stubs, deposit slips, withdrawal slips, cash books, telegraphic transfer forms, confirmations, daily sales records, purchase invoices, receipts, petty cash books, contracts) for the 3rd defendant from incorporation to September 2008 and to retain the Masters limitation of audited accounts of the 3rd and 4th defendants to the end of the 2007-2008 financial year; broad audit working papers and open-ended supporting documents were refused for both defendants, and supporting accounting documents for the 4th defendant were...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part and Master's orders varied as to scope of discovery for the 3rd defendant; other orders affirmed
Orders
- Order that audited accounts for the 3rd and 4th defendants remain limited to the end of their financial year 2007-2008
- Order that the 3rd defendant must disclose specified classes of primary transactional documents from incorporation to September 2008: cheque books and stubs, cash/cheque deposit slips, account withdrawal slips, cash books, telegraphic transfer application forms and confirmations, deposit records for daily sales...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment