STEP BY STEP LTD AND OTHERS v. DOROTHY JANE FURNESS AND OTHERS
The appeal was allowed in part: further evidence on appeal was admitted on special grounds; the Master’s open‑ended orders for all supporting audit working papers were varied and limited. The 3rd defendant must produce specified classes of primary transactional and banking records (cheque books and stubs, deposit slips, withdrawal slips, cash books, telegraphic transfer forms and confirmations, daily sales deposit records, daily sales receipts, purchase and expense records including contracts, invoices, goods receipt notes, receipts, diaries, petty cash books, and copies of contracts/agreements relating to assets) from incorporation to September 2008, verified on affidavit; audited...
- Citation
- STEP BY STEP LTD AND OTHERS v. DOROTHY JANE FURNESS AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Step By Step Limited; 2nd Plaintiff: New Success Enterprises Limited; 3rd Plaintiff: Step Up Limited; 1st Defendant: Dorothy Jane Furness; 2nd Defendant: Raphael Homer Echaluce; 3rd Defendant: Entertain Company Limited; 4th Defendant: Mad Dogs Wanchai Public House Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2009
- Case Number
- HCMP847/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Discovery / Interlocutory Appeal From Master’s Decision in Court of First Instance
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; Master’s orders varied to limit discovery to specified classes for 3rd defendant to Sep 2008; discovery for 4th defendant refused; audited accounts limited to end of FY 2007–2008; further evidence on appeal admitted; time for discovery and costs reserved for hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Specific Discovery, Relevance and Necessity, Tracing Misappropriated Funds, Scope of Audited Accounts, Admission of Further Evidence on Appeal, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Step By Step Limited
1st Plaintiff
New Success Enterprises Limited
2nd Plaintiff
Step Up Limited
3rd Plaintiff
Dorothy Jane Furness
1st Defendant
Raphael Homer Echaluce
2nd Defendant
Entertain Company Limited
3rd Defendant
Mad Dogs Wanchai Public House Limited
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Discovery / Interlocutory Appeal From Master’s Decision in Court of First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether further evidence should be admitted on appeal under Order 58 r 1(5)
- 2 Whether the classes of documents sought are relevant and necessary for fair disposal of the tracing issue
- 3 Whether the discovery requests were impermissibly overbroad and amounted to fishing
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed in part: further evidence on appeal was admitted on special grounds; the Master’s open‑ended orders for all supporting audit working papers were varied and limited. The 3rd defendant must produce specified classes of primary transactional and banking records (cheque books and stubs, deposit slips, withdrawal slips, cash books, telegraphic transfer forms and confirmations, daily sales deposit records, daily sales receipts, purchase and expense records including contracts, invoices, goods receipt notes, receipts, diaries, petty cash books, and copies of contracts/agreements relating to assets) from incorporation to September 2008, verified on affidavit; audited...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; Master’s orders varied to limit discovery to specified classes for 3rd defendant to Sep 2008; discovery for 4th defendant refused; audited accounts limited to end of FY 2007–2008; further evidence on appeal admitted; time for discovery and costs reserved for hearing.
Orders
- Admit plaintiffs’ further affidavit into evidence on appeal
- Order discovery from the 3rd defendant from incorporation to September 2008 limited to: cheque books and stubs, cash/cheque deposit slips, account withdrawal slips, cash books, telegraphic transfer application forms and confirmations, daily sales deposit records and daily sales receipts, purchase and expense records...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment