STEP BY STEP LTD AND OTHERS v. DOROTHY JANE FURNESS AND OTHERS
Further evidence on appeal admitted as special grounds were shown; Master’s orders were varied: discovery of narrowly defined classes of primary transactional documents of the 3rd defendant from incorporation to September 2008 was ordered (cheque books and stubs, deposit slips, account withdrawal slips, cash books, telegraphic transfer forms and confirmations, daily deposit records and sales records, purchase records including contracts, agreements, invoices, goods receipt notes, receipts, diaries or documents recording expenditure claimed, petty cash books, and copies of contracts/agreements documenting assets); audited accounts for 3rd and 4th defendants remain limited to the end of...
- Citation
- STEP BY STEP LTD AND OTHERS v. DOROTHY JANE FURNESS AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: STEP BY STEP LIMITED; 2nd Plaintiff: NEW SUCCESS ENTERPRISES LIMITED; 3rd Plaintiff: STEP UP LIMITED; 1st Defendant: DOROTHY JANE FURNESS; 2nd Defendant: RAPHAEL HOMER ECHALUCE; 3rd Defendant: ENTERTAIN COMPANY LIMITED; 4th Defendant: MAD DOGS WANCHAI PUBLIC HOUSE LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2009
- Case Number
- HCMP1208/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Discovery Appeal / Appeal to Court of First Instance (chambers)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; Master’s orders varied as to scope of discovery and further evidence admitted
- Legal Topics
- Specific Discovery, Relevance, Necessity, Tracing Misappropriated Funds, Audited Accounts, Bank and Accounting Records
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
STEP BY STEP LIMITED
1st Plaintiff
NEW SUCCESS ENTERPRISES LIMITED
2nd Plaintiff
STEP UP LIMITED
3rd Plaintiff
DOROTHY JANE FURNESS
1st Defendant
RAPHAEL HOMER ECHALUCE
2nd Defendant
ENTERTAIN COMPANY LIMITED
3rd Defendant
MAD DOGS WANCHAI PUBLIC HOUSE LIMITED
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Discovery Appeal / Appeal to Court of First Instance (chambers)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether documents sought are relevant to issues in the action
- 2 Whether documents are necessary for fair disposal or saving costs
- 3 Scope and limits of specific discovery (categories 2 and 4)
Ratio Decidendi
Further evidence on appeal admitted as special grounds were shown; Master’s orders were varied: discovery of narrowly defined classes of primary transactional documents of the 3rd defendant from incorporation to September 2008 was ordered (cheque books and stubs, deposit slips, account withdrawal slips, cash books, telegraphic transfer forms and confirmations, daily deposit records and sales records, purchase records including contracts, agreements, invoices, goods receipt notes, receipts, diaries or documents recording expenditure claimed, petty cash books, and copies of contracts/agreements documenting assets); audited accounts for 3rd and 4th defendants remain limited to the end of...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; Master’s orders varied as to scope of discovery and further evidence admitted
Orders
- Admit further affidavit evidence on appeal
- Order discovery from the 3rd defendant from incorporation to September 2008 of specified classes of primary transactional documents: cheque books and cheque book stubs; cash and cheque deposit slips; account withdrawal slips; cash books; telegraphic transfer application forms and confirmations of inward transfers;...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment