DIAGCOR BIOSCIENCE INCORPORATED LTD v. CHAN WAI HON BILLY AND OTHERS
Court ordered discovery of specified classes essential to test plaintiff's allegation of copying (classes 1(ii)–(v), 2, 3, 4–6 as modified and class 9 as modified), rejected staged/expert-only inspection proposals, required formation of a confidentiality club with written undertakings (including undertaking as to damages), dismissed the plaintiff's proposed unless order, and granted a split trial on liability and quantum.
- Citation
- DIAGCOR BIOSCIENCE INCORPORATED LTD v. CHAN WAI HON BILLY AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 9th Defendant: ACECGT DIAGNOSTIC LIMITED; 10th Defendant: ACECGT LIFE SCIENCE LIMITED; 11th Defendant: DNA LABORATORY LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2015
- Case Number
- HCA2107/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil: Breach of Confidence; Copyright Infringement; Breach of Contract; Procurement; Conspiracy / Interim Pre Trial Applications for Specific Discovery, Confidentiality Undertakings and Order for Split Trial on Liability and Quantum
- Outcome
- Application partly granted: specified discovery ordered; confidentiality undertakings required; proposed unless order dismissed; split trial ordered on liability and quantum.
- Legal Topics
- Specific Discovery, Confidentiality Club, Undertaking as to Confidentiality and Damages, Split Trial (liability and Quantum), Relevance and Necessity of Documents
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ACECGT DIAGNOSTIC LIMITED
9th Defendant
ACECGT LIFE SCIENCE LIMITED
10th Defendant
DNA LABORATORY LIMITED
11th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil: Breach of Confidence; Copyright Infringement; Breach of Contract; Procurement; Conspiracy / Interim Pre Trial Applications for Specific Discovery, Confidentiality Undertakings and Order for Split Trial on Liability and Quantum
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether specified classes of documents are in defendants' possession, custody or power and are relevant and necessary for fair disposal
- 2 Whether trade secrets/confidential information should be protected while permitting discovery
- 3 Appropriate mode of disclosure to protect confidential information
Ratio Decidendi
Court ordered discovery of specified classes essential to test plaintiff's allegation of copying (classes 1(ii)–(v), 2, 3, 4–6 as modified and class 9 as modified), rejected staged/expert-only inspection proposals, required formation of a confidentiality club with written undertakings (including undertaking as to damages), dismissed the plaintiff's proposed unless order, and granted a split trial on liability and quantum.
Court Disposition
Application partly granted: specified discovery ordered; confidentiality undertakings required; proposed unless order dismissed; split trial ordered on liability and quantum.
Orders
- Defendants to file and serve affidavit by 21 September 2015 stating whether classes 1(ii)-(v), 2, 3, 4-6 (modified) and 9 (modified) have ever been in their possession, custody or power and, if not, when and what became of them
- Disclosure of classes 1(ii)-(v), 2, 3, 4-6 (as modified) and 9 (as modified) for plaintiff's inspection within 24 hours of filing the affidavit
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment