FULLHOUSE TRADING CO LTD v. NOBLEGAIN LTD
The court held that Noblegain made out a prima facie case that the financial statements, auditors' reports and tax returns of Success On (including Dongguan Success On) for 1998/1999 to 2003/2004 were relevant to quantum and an account of profits and ordered their disclosure; the court found documents filed in relation to Fullhouse's deregistration and reinstatement were relevant and ordered disclosure of those documents, rejected Fullhouse's purported absence of other documents for disclosure, exercised discretion to permit the application notwithstanding delay, and made specific costs directions allocating costs between the parties.
- Citation
- FULLHOUSE TRADING CO LTD v. NOBLEGAIN LTD
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hca 7865/2000): NOBLEGAIN LIMITED; 1st Defendant: MAK SHU SUN (aka Raymond Mak); 2nd Defendant: LEE KAM HUNG (aka Winsome Lee); 3rd Defendant: YEUNG WAI HAR (aka Connie Yeung); 4th Defendant: SUCCESS ON ENTERPRISES LIMITED; 5th Defendant: CHAN MAN WONG; 6th Defendant; Plaintiff (hca 5207/1999): FULLHOUSE TRADING COMPANY LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2011
- Case Number
- HCA5207/1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Discovery Application (specific Discovery) / Interlocutory Decision on Summons for Specific Discovery
- Outcome
- Application granted in part and refused in part; discovery ordered against Success On Enterprises Limited and ordered for Fullhouse documents relating to deregistration/reinstatement; limited disclosure against Fullhouse otherwise refused for lack of documents; costs orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Specific Discovery Under Order 24, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Conspiracy to Injure, Account of Profits, Costs Orders, Deregistration and Document Preservation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NOBLEGAIN LIMITED
Plaintiff (hca 7865/2000)
MAK SHU SUN (aka Raymond Mak)
1st Defendant
LEE KAM HUNG (aka Winsome Lee)
2nd Defendant
YEUNG WAI HAR (aka Connie Yeung)
3rd Defendant
SUCCESS ON ENTERPRISES LIMITED
4th Defendant
CHAN MAN WONG
5th Defendant
FULLHOUSE TRADING COMPANY LIMITED
6th Defendant; Plaintiff (hca 5207/1999)
Procedural Posture
Civil Discovery Application (specific Discovery) / Interlocutory Decision on Summons for Specific Discovery
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff established a prima facie case to justify specific discovery under Order 24 rules 3 and 7
- 2 Whether the financial statements, auditors' reports and tax returns of Success On and Fullhouse are relevant to quantum and account of profits
- 3 Whether the plaintiff's eight year delay in pursuing earlier discovery defeats the application or causes prejudice
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that Noblegain made out a prima facie case that the financial statements, auditors' reports and tax returns of Success On (including Dongguan Success On) for 1998/1999 to 2003/2004 were relevant to quantum and an account of profits and ordered their disclosure; the court found documents filed in relation to Fullhouse's deregistration and reinstatement were relevant and ordered disclosure of those documents, rejected Fullhouse's purported absence of other documents for disclosure, exercised discretion to permit the application notwithstanding delay, and made specific costs directions allocating costs between the parties.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part and refused in part; discovery ordered against Success On Enterprises Limited and ordered for Fullhouse documents relating to deregistration/reinstatement; limited disclosure against Fullhouse otherwise refused for lack of documents; costs orders made.
Orders
- In HCA 7865/2000 Success On Enterprises Limited to disclose to Noblegain Limited all financial statements, auditors' reports and tax returns of Success On Enterprises Limited and all its subsidiaries or affiliates including Dongguan Success On for the period 1998/1999 to 2003/2004 filed in Hong Kong and in the PRC.
- Costs nisi: as between Noblegain and the 4th and 6th Defendants the 4th and 6th Defendants shall pay Noblegain's costs; as between Noblegain and the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 5th Defendants those Defendants shall have their costs in the cause; 1st,2nd,3rd and 5th Defendants awarded costs against Noblegain in the event they...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment