POON KA MAN JASON v. CHENG WAI TAO AND OTHERS
The court held that Fine Elite's application to register the Service Marks in Hong Kong, made and maintained after the Hero Elegant Agreement, constituted a breach that went to the substance of the agreement and amounted to repudiation; Ricky accepted that repudiation and discharged the contract. Fine Elite acted in bad faith and is barred from equitable relief. Smart Wave, not being bound by the Hero Elegant Agreement, succeeded in a derivative claim limited to damages for Ricky's operation of the Itacho restaurants, with damages to be assessed and specified costs orders issued.
- Citation
- POON KA MAN JASON v. CHENG WAI TAO AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hca 1269/2008; Corporate Vehicle for Daisy and Jason): Fine Elite Group Limited; Defendant (hca 1269/2008) and 1st Defendant (hca 304/2011): Cheng Wai Tao; Plaintiff (hca 304/2011) (suing on Behalf of Himself and Other Smart Wave Shareholders): Poon Ka Man Jason; 2nd Defendant (hca 304/2011): Smart Wave Limited; 3rd Defendant: Joyful Gain Limited; 4th Defendant: Perfect Plan Limited; 5th Defendant: Regal Well Limited; 6th Defendant: Well Keen International Limited; 7th Defendant: Wise Master Development Limited; 8th Defendant: Charm Gold Limited; 9th Defendant: Pacific Giant Limited; 10th Defendant: Faithful Gain Limited; 11th Defendant: Ocean Profit Enterprises Limited; 12th Defendant: Bonway Limited; 13th Defendant: Star Wave Trading Limited; 14th Defendant: Sander Limited; 15th Defendant: Wise Faith Investments Limited; 16th Defendant: Gold Wisdom Trading Limited; 17th Defendant: Wise Hero International Limited; 18th Defendant: Profit Star Enterprises Limited; 19th Defendant: Lamway Limited; 20th Defendant: Ocean Pioneer Development Limited; 21st Defendant: Richtop Limited; 22nd Defendant: Forever Winner Limited; 23rd Defendant: Way Time Limited; 24th Defendant: Silver Wave Investments Limited; 25th Defendant: Well Force International Limited; 26th Defendant: Win Noble Limited; 27th Defendant: Dragon Perfect Limited; 28th Defendant: Wise Progress Holdings Limited; 29th Defendant: Win Elite International Limited; 30th Defendant: Wise Genius Investments Limited; 31st Defendant: Wise Team Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2013
- Case Number
- HCA304/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Shareholders Dispute; Derivative Action; Trademark Opposition / Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- HCA 1269/2008 (Fine Elite v Cheng Wai Tao) dismissed; HCA 304/2011 (derivative claim on behalf of Smart Wave) allowed in part for damages to be assessed against Ricky in respect of Itacho restaurants.
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Repudiation and Acceptance, Implied Terms, Bad Faith in Trademark Registration, Derivative Action, Damages and Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fine Elite Group Limited
Plaintiff (hca 1269/2008; Corporate Vehicle for Daisy and Jason)
Cheng Wai Tao
Defendant (hca 1269/2008) and 1st Defendant (hca 304/2011)
Poon Ka Man Jason
Plaintiff (hca 304/2011) (suing on Behalf of Himself and Other Smart Wave Shareholders)
Smart Wave Limited
2nd Defendant (hca 304/2011)
Joyful Gain Limited
3rd Defendant
Perfect Plan Limited
4th Defendant
Regal Well Limited
5th Defendant
Well Keen International Limited
6th Defendant
Wise Master Development Limited
7th Defendant
Charm Gold Limited
8th Defendant
Pacific Giant Limited
9th Defendant
Faithful Gain Limited
10th Defendant
Ocean Profit Enterprises Limited
11th Defendant
Bonway Limited
12th Defendant
Star Wave Trading Limited
13th Defendant
Sander Limited
14th Defendant
Wise Faith Investments Limited
15th Defendant
Gold Wisdom Trading Limited
16th Defendant
Wise Hero International Limited
17th Defendant
Profit Star Enterprises Limited
18th Defendant
Lamway Limited
19th Defendant
Ocean Pioneer Development Limited
20th Defendant
Richtop Limited
21st Defendant
Forever Winner Limited
22nd Defendant
Way Time Limited
23rd Defendant
Silver Wave Investments Limited
24th Defendant
Well Force International Limited
25th Defendant
Win Noble Limited
26th Defendant
Dragon Perfect Limited
27th Defendant
Wise Progress Holdings Limited
28th Defendant
Win Elite International Limited
29th Defendant
Wise Genius Investments Limited
30th Defendant
Wise Team Limited
31st Defendant
Procedural Posture
Shareholders Dispute; Derivative Action; Trademark Opposition / Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Fine Elite repudiated the Hero Elegant Agreement by applying to register the Service Marks in its name
- 2 Whether Ricky accepted Fine Elite's repudiatory breach thereby discharging the contract
- 3 Whether Fine Elite is entitled to specific performance or damages
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that Fine Elite's application to register the Service Marks in Hong Kong, made and maintained after the Hero Elegant Agreement, constituted a breach that went to the substance of the agreement and amounted to repudiation; Ricky accepted that repudiation and discharged the contract. Fine Elite acted in bad faith and is barred from equitable relief. Smart Wave, not being bound by the Hero Elegant Agreement, succeeded in a derivative claim limited to damages for Ricky's operation of the Itacho restaurants, with damages to be assessed and specified costs orders issued.
Court Disposition
HCA 1269/2008 (Fine Elite v Cheng Wai Tao) dismissed; HCA 304/2011 (derivative claim on behalf of Smart Wave) allowed in part for damages to be assessed against Ricky in respect of Itacho restaurants.
Orders
- Dismissal of Fine Elite's claims in HCA 1269/2008 with costs to Ricky (including certificate for two counsel)
- Allow Smart Wave's claim in HCA 304/2011 for damages against Ricky to be assessed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment