陳雲及另一人 對 振威金屬有限公司及另二人
The plaintiffs' claim based on an alleged oral agreement to sell the property in July 2011 failed because the court did not accept the plaintiffs' evidence and, in any event, agreements for sale of land are unenforceable if not in writing under Cap.219 s3; title passed to the defendants by the 1999 assignment supported by contemporaneous cheques and documents, thus plaintiffs must surrender vacant possession and pay arrears, rates, government rent and mesne profits as assessed.
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 2911
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: CHAN WAN (陳雲); Second Plaintiff (personal Representative): CHAN WAN (陳雲), personal representative of the Estate of CHAN KAI WING (陳啓榮); First Defendant: CHUN WAI METAL LIMITED (振威金屬有限公司); Second Defendant: HO KWOK WAI (何國威); Third Defendant (personal Representative): HO KWOK WAI (何國威), personal representative of the Estate of TANG PUI CHOI (鄧佩彩)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2021
- Case Number
- HCA1824/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action (property/title Dispute) / Judgment (trial Concluded)
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' principal claim for enforcement of an oral sale agreement dismissed; defendants' entitlement to title, vacant possession, arrears, rates, government rent and mesne profits upheld
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Oral Agreement for Sale of Land, Statute of Frauds (writing Requirement), Title Dispute, Mesne Profits (interim收益), Rent Arrears, Limitation/time Bar
- Source Language
- CH
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN WAN (陳雲)
First Plaintiff
CHAN WAN (陳雲), personal representative of the Estate of CHAN KAI WING (陳啓榮)
Second Plaintiff (personal Representative)
CHUN WAI METAL LIMITED (振威金屬有限公司)
First Defendant
HO KWOK WAI (何國威)
Second Defendant
HO KWOK WAI (何國威), personal representative of the Estate of TANG PUI CHOI (鄧佩彩)
Third Defendant (personal Representative)
Procedural Posture
Civil Action (property/title Dispute) / Judgment (trial Concluded)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an oral agreement in July 2011 for sale of land for HK$650,000 was concluded and enforceable
- 2 Whether the HK$300,000 paid on 15 July 2011 was payment towards purchase price or payment of rent arrears
- 3 Whether the 1999 assignment transferred title to the first defendant and whether the deposit was paid
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs' claim based on an alleged oral agreement to sell the property in July 2011 failed because the court did not accept the plaintiffs' evidence and, in any event, agreements for sale of land are unenforceable if not in writing under Cap.219 s3; title passed to the defendants by the 1999 assignment supported by contemporaneous cheques and documents, thus plaintiffs must surrender vacant possession and pay arrears, rates, government rent and mesne profits as assessed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' principal claim for enforcement of an oral sale agreement dismissed; defendants' entitlement to title, vacant possession, arrears, rates, government rent and mesne profits upheld
Orders
- Plaintiffs must deliver vacant possession of the property to the second and third defendants
- Plaintiffs must pay outstanding rent of HKD 386710.00 (being HKD 686710.00 less the HKD 300000.00 paid by the second plaintiff on 15 July 2011)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment