RE TONG CHI KEUNG, TOM

RE TONG CHI KEUNG, TOM

The debtor failed to prove a bona fide dispute on substantial grounds: the US$319,000 deposits had been applied to earlier debts, the alleged standing discounts and agent rebates were either conditional on payment or required registration and were unsupported by credible evidence, and the debtor admitted an undisputed balance of US$119,000 which exceeds the statutory threshold; accordingly a bankruptcy order was made.

Citation
RE TONG CHI KEUNG, TOM
Parties
Petitioner/creditor: Desert Palace Inc (trading as Caesars Palace of Las Vegas); Debtor: Tong Chi Keung Tom
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
4 July 2007
Case Number
HCB2960/2006
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Hearing and Judgment (trial)
Outcome
Bankruptcy order made against the debtor (Tong Chi Keung Tom).
Legal Topics
Statutory Demand, Bankruptcy Order, Enforceability of Casino Markers, Set Off/discount Claims, Agent Registration Under Gaming Law, Jurisdiction/enforceability of Foreign Gambling Debts
Source Language
EN
Insolvency Bankruptcy Contract Law Gaming Law Conflict of Laws Statutory Demand Bankruptcy Order Enforceability of Casino Markers +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Desert Palace Inc (trading as Caesars Palace of Las Vegas)

Petitioner/creditor

Tong Chi Keung Tom

Debtor

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy Petition / Hearing and Judgment (trial)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Nevada casino markers are enforceable in Hong Kong
  2. 2 Whether the debtor raised a bona fide dispute on substantial grounds to defeat the statutory demand
  3. 3 Whether alleged deposits, discounts or rebates extinguished or reduced the petitioning debt

Ratio Decidendi

The debtor failed to prove a bona fide dispute on substantial grounds: the US$319,000 deposits had been applied to earlier debts, the alleged standing discounts and agent rebates were either conditional on payment or required registration and were unsupported by credible evidence, and the debtor admitted an undisputed balance of US$119,000 which exceeds the statutory threshold; accordingly a bankruptcy order was made.

Court Disposition

Bankruptcy order made against the debtor (Tong Chi Keung Tom).

Orders

  • Bankruptcy order made against Tong Chi Keung Tom
  • Petitioner\'s costs in the petition, including reserved costs, to be paid out of the debtor\'s assets